OSAT OK121 study materials
OSAT OK121 study resources

The Family Tree and the Harvest Feast

OSAT OK121 · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

The Family Tree and the Harvest Feast

Ms. T teaches kindergarten. In November her school runs a "Family Traditions" unit that ends with a Harvest Feast, a turkey handprint craft, and a homework family tree requiring baby photographs and grandparents' names. Of her 20 students, five speak Spanish at home, and one, Amina, arrived from Somalia in September. Amina's mother, through the district interpreter, asks that Amina not attend the feast and says the family tree assignment "is not something we can do." When Ms. T asks why, the mother says only that it is private. A second parent emails that the feast is "a waste of instructional time" and wants her child moved to another activity. The principal says seasonal activities should be "uniform for all children" and asks Ms. T to "handle it quietly." Amina is a strong student who has just begun to make friends and often asks to help.

1. Evaluate both family requests and the principal's instruction. What principles apply?

Read the worked answer

The family is the authority on its own culture, and a mother does not owe an explanation for a private matter. Asking a child to participate in a celebration her family has declined, or singling her out by sending her to another room, is not neutral - it marks her as different in front of the class. The family tree homework has a separate equity problem: it assumes photographs exist, that adults are available to help, and that a child's household matches a biological template. That assignment is inaccessible to more families than Amina's.

The second parent's objection is a curriculum question, not a values question, and can be answered on instructional grounds. The principal's "uniform for all" and "handle it quietly" instructions conflict with both equity and transparency: quiet handling of a religious or cultural accommodation is how children get publicly excluded. The right response is to redesign the activity so participation is genuinely universal, not to arrange a private exception. That serves the standard, the family, and the principal at once.

2. Design a revised unit and celebration that includes every child.

Read the worked answer

Reframe the unit around a standard-based question - how do families care for one another? - rather than around one holiday. Replace the family tree with a choice board: draw the people you live with, bring a photograph if you want to, interview an elder, or draw a favorite food. Every option meets the same speaking and listening standard; none requires a camera or a particular household structure.

Replace the Harvest Feast with a "classroom community table" where each family may send a food that is meaningful to them, with all contributions served together and no requirement to bring anything. Keep the tasting, the graphing of who liked what, and the oral sharing - the learning is in the comparison and the language, not the turkey.

Give Amina a real role, such as passing out napkins or introducing the food graph, so she participates visibly without being put on display. Send the choice board home in Spanish and Somali, and make clear that any option is fully acceptable. Then run the same activity next year so it is not a one-time favor.

3. How would you communicate with Amina's mother, the second parent, and the principal?

Read the worked answer

With Amina's mother, meet privately with the interpreter, thank her for telling you, and ask what she is comfortable with rather than what she objects to. Offer the revised options and say plainly that Amina will not be singled out or asked to explain herself. Follow up with a short written note in her language, and check in after the event.

With the second parent, answer the instructional question: describe the standards, the graphing and oral language work, and the choice board, and explain that all children participate in the redesigned activity, so no child needs an opt-out. Do not discuss Amina's family.

With the principal, frame it as compliance and risk rather than as a conflict: the redesign meets the same standards, protects the school from a religious-accommodation complaint, and avoids a public exclusion. Put the redesign in writing and ask for confirmation if the direction is unclear. If you are ever directed to exclude a child, ask for that instruction in writing and consult district-level curriculum or equity staff - that is a legitimate professional step, not insubordination.