PA Bar study materials
PA Bar study resources

Pay-If-Paid, Liquidated Damages, and a 45-Day Owner Delay

PA Bar · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Pay-If-Paid, Liquidated Damages, and a 45-Day Owner Delay

Keystone Builders, a Pennsylvania general contractor, hires Lehigh Interiors, a Pennsylvania drywall subcontractor, for a Bethlehem warehouse. The $480,000 subcontract, drafted by Keystone, states in bold: 'Subcontractor shall be paid for approved work only if and when Contractor receives payment from Owner for that work. Subcontractor waives all claims for delay damages, including owner-caused delay.' It also provides $1,500 per day in liquidated damages for late completion. The owner makes 45 days of design changes, delaying all trades. Keystone pays Lehigh for most work but withholds the final $120,000 because the owner has not paid Keystone for the drywall. Lehigh finished 10 days later than the original schedule, but Keystone's own schedule revisions caused the shift. Keystone also withholds $15,000 in liquidated damages. Lehigh sues for the balance and delay damages.

1. Lehigh argues the pay-if-paid clause is an unenforceable penalty or violates public policy. Is the clause enforceable, and what must Keystone show to rely on it?

Read the worked answer

Pennsylvania distinguishes pay-when-paid clauses, which address timing, from pay-if-paid clauses, which make owner payment a condition precedent to the subcontractor's right to payment. Clear language-especially 'only if and when'-can create a condition precedent, shifting the risk of owner insolvency or nonpayment to the subcontractor. Because Keystone drafted the clause, ambiguity is construed against Keystone, but this language is fairly clear. The clause is not a penalty; it limits the source of payment rather than imposing a punishment. To rely on it, Keystone must prove that the owner has not paid specifically for Lehigh's drywall work and that the nonpayment is not due to Keystone's own breach, delay, or prevention. If Keystone's schedule revisions or defective work prevented the owner's payment, the condition is excused. The Pennsylvania Contractor and Subcontractor Payment Act imposes prompt-payment duties and interest, but it does not automatically void a clear pay-if-paid clause; the court should examine whether Keystone's own conduct caused the owner's nonpayment.

2. Keystone withholds $15,000 in liquidated damages. Are the $1,500-per-day damages enforceable, and does Lehigh's 10-day delay support them?

Read the worked answer

Pennsylvania enforces liquidated damages if, at contract formation, the amount is a reasonable forecast of anticipated harm and actual damages would be difficult to estimate. If the amount is grossly disproportionate to the probable loss, it is a penalty. $1,500 per day on a $480,000 subcontract is roughly 0.3% per day, which can be reasonable if tied to the owner's delay costs or extended overhead; it is not automatically a penalty. But Keystone must show that Lehigh caused the 10-day delay. The facts say Keystone's own schedule revisions shifted the work, so the delay may be concurrent or Keystone-caused. A liquidated-damages clause compensates for delay caused by the breaching party; it does not apply where the delay is not attributable to Lehigh. The court should allocate delay and deny the withholding if Keystone caused the shift.

3. Can Lehigh recover delay damages for the 45-day owner-caused delay despite the no-damages-for-delay clause?

Read the worked answer

Pennsylvania generally enforces no-damages-for-delay clauses, but recognizes exceptions: delays not contemplated by the contract, active interference by the owner or contractor, bad faith, and delays so unreasonable that they fall outside the parties' contemplation. Owner-directed design changes are often contemplated by a changes clause, so Lehigh may be limited to a change-order remedy rather than delay damages. But 45 days of changes that disrupted all trades, combined with Keystone's own schedule revisions, may qualify as active interference or an uncontemplated delay. The court should examine the subcontract's changes clause, whether Lehigh gave notice, and whether the delay was discrete and foreseeable. If the clause applies, Lehigh recovers nothing for the 45 days; if an exception applies, Lehigh may recover extended overhead proved with reasonable certainty.