PA Dental Hygiene Jurisprudence study materials
PA Dental Hygiene Jurisprudence study resources

PA Dental Hygiene Jurisprudence: Board Authority, Licensure, and Discipline (Unprofessional Conduct; Standards of Acceptable and Prevailing Practice)

PA Dental Hygiene Jurisprudence · Work through your exam, one topic at a time.

All guide sections

Board Authority, Licensure, and Discipline (Unprofessional Conduct; Standards of Acceptable and Prevailing Practice)

Board authority

The State Board of Dentistry sits within the Department of State's Bureau of Professional and Occupational Affairs. It adopts regulations at 49 Pa. Code Chapter 33, approves dental and dental hygiene education programs, administers licensure and renewal, investigates complaints, holds administrative hearings, and imposes discipline. Its authority is regulatory and disciplinary, not judicial in the malpractice sense: it can suspend, revoke, restrict, reprimand, place on probation, or impose civil penalties, but it does not award damages to patients.

Licensure and discipline

Licensure requires graduation from an approved program, passing the required national and clinical examinations, and meeting any jurisprudence and CE requirements. Renewal is biennial and conditioned on continuing education and compliance with reporting duties. "Unprofessional conduct" is the Board's central disciplinary standard and includes practicing beyond scope, gross negligence or incompetence, abandoning patients, failing to maintain adequate records, violating infection-control requirements, practicing while impaired, fraud or deceit in licensure, aiding unlicensed practice, and failing to make required referrals. The Board also enforces the standards of acceptable and prevailing practice: the care rendered must meet the professional standard, and the supervising dentist must actually supervise.

Worked example

A patient complains that a hygienist performed a deep cleaning without the dentist ever examining her. Investigators find no documented dentist exam or plan. The hygienist's defense-"the dentist was in the building"-does not cure the missing diagnosis and authorization. The hygienist faces discipline for practicing beyond scope, and the dentist faces discipline for failing to supervise and document. If the complaint were only that the cleaning was uncomfortable, the Board would ask whether care fell below the prevailing standard, not whether the patient was unhappy.

Traps

Confusing Board discipline with a malpractice lawsuit; assuming a license renewal is automatic; treating "unprofessional conduct" as limited to criminal acts; and overlooking that inadequate supervision can discipline both dentist and hygienist.