A Zoning Contingency That Expires Before the Hearing Board Meets
Buyer Chen contracts to buy a 1920s house for $265,000. The agreement says it is contingent on Chen obtaining a municipal use permit to operate a two-unit rental within 45 days, and “time is of the essence.” The seller says the basement apartment “has been rented for years, so zoning is grandfathered.” Chen learns the property is in a single-family zoning district, the basement unit lacks a certificate of occupancy, and the municipality’s zoning hearing board meets in 70 days. Chen’s lender will not count rental income without a legal two-unit certificate. The agreement has no extension clause. On day 44 Chen asks for a 60-day extension; the seller refuses and demands closing on day 45. Chen has already paid a $5,000 deposit and $1,800 for inspection and appraisal.
1. What is the effect of the use-permit contingency and the “time is of the essence” clause? Can the seller force Chen to close on day 45?
Read the worked answer
The use-permit contingency makes Chen’s obligation to close conditional on obtaining the municipal permit within 45 days. Because time is expressly of the essence, the deadline matters. Chen cannot simply ignore the deadline and expect the contingency to remain open indefinitely.
On day 44, Chen should have requested a written extension before the deadline expired. A request made one day before expiration may be too late, and the seller is not obligated to grant it. If the contingency is not satisfied or waived by day 45, the contract may give the seller the right to terminate, declare Chen in breach, or demand closing if the seller takes the position that Chen failed to pursue the permit diligently. The seller cannot, however, force Chen to close on a use that the municipality has not approved if the contract conditions closing on that approval.
The outcome depends on the contract’s remedy language. Chen should not assume the deposit is automatically refundable. He should review the contingency and default provisions with counsel immediately.
2. How should Chen evaluate the seller’s “grandfathered” statement and the risk of the unpermitted basement unit?
Read the worked answer
Chen should not rely on the seller’s oral statement. A nonconforming use may be protected only if it was lawful when it began, has continued without abandonment, and meets municipal requirements. A basement unit that lacks a certificate of occupancy may not be a legal nonconforming use. The municipality, not the seller, determines zoning status.
Chen should:
- Obtain the zoning officer’s written determination and the property’s permit history.
- Ask whether the basement unit is a lawful nonconforming use or requires a variance, special exception, or conditional use.
- Confirm whether a certificate of occupancy is required before rental.
- Ask the lender in writing whether it will count rental income without the certificate.
The seller’s statement may also trigger Pennsylvania seller-disclosure issues if the seller knew the unit was unpermitted. But disclosure does not cure the zoning problem. The $1,800 already spent on inspection and appraisal is a sunk cost; Chen should not let it push him into a closing that leaves him with an illegal unit and a loan that does not perform as expected.
3. What options does Chen have on day 44, and what should the broker advise about the deposit and closing?
Read the worked answer
Chen’s options include negotiating a written extension, waiving the contingency and closing at his own risk, terminating and seeking return of the deposit, or restructuring the deal with a holdback or price reduction. A 60-day extension to accommodate the 70-day hearing schedule is reasonable, but the seller can refuse. Chen should put every request in writing and preserve evidence of his diligence.
The broker should advise Chen to get legal advice on the contract’s contingency, default, and deposit provisions. The broker should not promise that the deposit is refundable or that the seller must extend. If Chen terminates, the seller may dispute the deposit; if Chen closes without the permit, he may face municipal enforcement, inability to rent legally, and lender issues.
A practical compromise is a written extension coupled with a seller holdback or price adjustment, but the lender must approve. The broker should also verify the zoning determination directly with the municipality and document the seller’s representations. The key lesson is that a contingent contract needs a realistic deadline and an extension mechanism before the deadline is reached.