Recruitment Fees and the 72-Hour Week
Vantara is a European apparel brand with 120 suppliers. Its top supplier, in Southeast Asia, employs 3,000 workers, 70% internal migrants. A surprise audit found that workers paid recruitment fees of about USD 350-roughly one month’s wage-to labour brokers; production workers averaged 72 hours per week for three months; a subcontractor kept workers’ passports “for safekeeping”; and dormitory deductions consumed 18% of take-home pay. Vantara’s code prohibits all of this. The supplier says the fees were paid before hiring and that overtime is needed because Vantara changed a design late and kept a 45-day payment term. Vantara has one social responsibility manager, no supplier remediation budget, and six months before its next buying season. The commercial director proposes dropping the supplier immediately to “send a signal” and moving the order to a new factory with no audit history.
1. Which ISO 26000 core subjects and issues are most serious here, and is immediate termination of the supplier consistent with ISO 26000? Explain the trade-offs.
Read the worked answer
The most serious issues are human rights and labour practices: recruitment fees can create debt bondage, passport retention is a forced-labour indicator, 72-hour weeks threaten health and safety, and dormitory deductions may push wages below subsistence. Fair operating practices are also engaged because Vantara's design changes and 45-day payment terms transfer cost and risk to the supplier. Immediate termination is not automatically consistent with ISO 26000. The standard expects leverage and responsible exit: terminating without remediation may leave workers unpaid, fees unrecovered and passports still held, and simply moves the problem. The better path is a time-bound remediation plan with commercial consequences. Termination may become appropriate if the supplier refuses to remedy forced-labour indicators or retaliates against workers, but even then Vantara should ensure workers receive owed wages, documents and support. The commercial director's 'signal' is understandable, but the signal should be 'we will fix and stay engaged', not 'we will disappear'.
2. Design a six-month remediation and prevention plan that uses commercial levers as well as audits. Include how you would verify that fees are repaid and passports returned.
Read the worked answer
Six-month plan: immediately require return of all passports and written confirmation that workers keep their own documents; require repayment of recruitment fees to affected workers, with a payroll audit and worker interviews to verify; prohibit worker-paid fees in future contracts and audit labour brokers. Adjust Vantara's own practices: extend design freeze dates, improve forecasting, and shorten payment terms or provide affordable bridge financing so overtime is not used to absorb brand delays. Cap overtime at legal and safe levels, with production planning and worker consultation. Address dormitory deductions by reviewing the accommodation contract and ensuring any charges are transparent and lawful. Set up an independent grievance channel with retaliation protection. Use a supplier scorecard and buyer KPIs; hold a remediation budget; verify through unannounced audits, worker interviews and document checks; escalate to senior management if milestones are missed. The aim is to fix the system, not just the audit finding.
3. The commercial director calls an unaudited new factory 'lower risk' because it has no findings. Explain the flaw and the minimum steps before placing orders there.
Read the worked answer
The reasoning is flawed because absence of an audit is not evidence of absence of risk; it is absence of information. A new factory with no audit history may have undisclosed recruitment fees, unsafe buildings, unauthorized subcontracting or excessive hours, and Vantara would have no baseline or leverage. Moving orders quickly also creates pressure that can cause the very labour abuses the brand is trying to avoid. Before placing any order, Vantara should conduct a risk assessment by country and product, audit or independently assess the new site, require contracts that prohibit worker-paid fees and passport retention, map subcontractors, establish a grievance mechanism, and set a probationary period with verification. If it cannot do this before the season, it should not use 'no findings' as a justification; it should either delay the order or disclose the limitation and manage it. The commercial director is comparing a known problem with an unknown one and calling the unknown safer.