Speaking: Taking a Turn with a Dominant Partner
Diego is taking PEIC Level 3 Speaking with a partner, Lena. In Part 3 they have two minutes to discuss four options for a college trip and agree on two. Almost immediately Lena says, 'No, that's boring,' about Diego's first idea, then speaks for 75 seconds without stopping. When she pauses, she asks Diego a closed question: 'You agree, right?' Diego has about 45 seconds left. He is worried that interrupting will seem rude and that the examiner will blame him for the poor interaction. The examiner's mark scheme includes interactive communication and turn-taking. Diego's own English is B2: he can give opinions and negotiate, but he rarely initiates in class. He tends to wait for a clear invitation before speaking, and he has never practised the task with a dominant partner.
1. What exactly is Diego assessed on in Part 3, and why is silence risky?
Read the worked answer
Part 3 assesses interactive communication: initiating, responding, developing ideas, negotiating agreement and managing turns. The examiner is listening for evidence that he can do these things, not just for correct grammar. Silence is risky because there is no evidence to reward: if Lena speaks for 75 seconds and Diego only answers a closed question, he has shown response but little initiation or negotiation. The task outcome - choosing two options - still matters, but the process is assessed. Diego should not wait for a clear invitation, because dominant partners rarely give one. He needs to create a legitimate turn with a signpost, then use it to develop or negotiate. The examiner can then award the interactive features even if the final choice is Lena's.
2. Give three specific phrases and one non-verbal strategy Diego can use to take a turn politely within the next 45 seconds.
Read the worked answer
Phrases: (1) 'Sorry to interrupt, but can I add something?' (2) 'That's a good point - can we also consider...?' (3) 'Can I just come in here for a second?' Non-verbal: lean forward slightly, open palm towards Lena, say her name ('Lena, what if...'). The signpost signals that he is not attacking her; the question form invites a response. He should use one immediately, not wait. He can also use a summary move: 'So far we've got A and B; shall we compare C?' This takes a turn while appearing collaborative. The reasoning: politeness in English is often carried by the softener ('sorry', 'just', 'can I'), not by silence.
3. How should Diego respond to Lena's 'No, that's boring' and the closed question?
Read the worked answer
He should not mirror the dismissal or withdraw. Acknowledge and reframe: 'I see why you'd say that - maybe we could make it more interesting by adding a workshop.' Then answer the closed question with expansion: 'I partly agree, but I'd prefer the museum because it's cheaper.' Finally propose a decision procedure: 'Shall we compare cost and travel time, then choose two?' This shows negotiation rather than compliance. If only 45 seconds remain, he should suggest a vote: 'We've got two minutes; let's each pick one and then agree the second.' The reasoning: the examiner rewards development and agreement, not winning. Reframing keeps his idea alive and gives Lena a face-saving way to move.