Airport Alert and the Collapsing Passenger
At 06:40 on a Tuesday, you are the AFP officer on duty at the international terminal of a major Australian airport. A watchlist alert identifies a 41-year-old man on an inbound flight from Auckland as having an outstanding Commonwealth arrest warrant for alleged fraud. The flight has begun disembarking. When you approach him in the arrivals hall, he is sweating, pale, and complains of chest pain. He says he has no medication and becomes confused about where he is. The terminal is busy, and your colleague suggests immediate handcuffing and removal to the holding room so the arrest is not disrupted. A paramedic is not yet on scene; ambulance response is estimated at 12 minutes. The man repeatedly tries to walk toward the departure level, saying he must catch a connecting flight. You have no information that he is violent, but he is non-compliant with directions.
1. What is your immediate priority in the first five minutes, and what specific actions do you take?
Read the worked answer
Issue: You have a lawful arrest warrant, but the man may be having a medical emergency. The warrant authorises arrest; it does not suspend the duty of care or authorise unnecessary force.
Options: (a) arrest and restrain immediately; (b) delay arrest and treat the matter as medical; (c) contain him, call an ambulance, and arrest once stable.
Reasoning: Chest pain, pallor, sweating and confusion are red flags. Handcuffing a collapsing person increases risk and looks poor on CCTV. The airport is crowded, so keep him away from the gate and moving traffic. A 12-minute ambulance is acceptable if he is monitored.
Action: Identify yourself, explain the warrant, and tell him he is not free to leave. Guide him to a seat or holding room rather than forcing him to the floor. Call the ambulance and airport medical. Keep him upright if breathing allows, monitor his response, and remove anything he could use to hurt himself. Ask about medication and allergies. Request a supervisor and preserve CCTV. Do not let him board. If he becomes unresponsive, first aid takes priority and the ambulance is escalated. Document times and decisions.
2. He refuses ambulance assessment and tries to walk to the departure level. What legal and practical options do you have?
Read the worked answer
Issue: The warrant gives authority to arrest; refusal of medical care does not cancel it. But capacity and welfare still matter.
Options: arrest and physically restrain; negotiate; use airport security to block his path; call the ambulance anyway.
Reasoning: Use only force that is necessary and proportionate. If he is confused, he may lack capacity to refuse; get paramedic advice. Arrest is lawful, but dragging a possibly cardiac patient is risky. A short delay to get medical clearance is reasonable if he is contained.
Action: Tell him clearly he is under arrest on the warrant and must remain. Use two officers and minimal hands-on guidance; avoid neck or chest pressure. Ask airport staff to hold the connecting gate and retrieve baggage only if safe. If he actively resists, use handcuffs and leg restraint only as required, and monitor breathing continuously. Ask the ambulance to attend the holding room. If a paramedic clears him, complete the arrest and search; if not, hospital guard. Record all force used.
3. What must you document and report, and why?
Read the worked answer
Issue: Accountable use of police powers and welfare.
Action: Record the warrant number, time and place of arrest, what you said, his responses, medical signs, ambulance times, force used and why, CCTV, witnesses, and supervisor notifications. Complete a use-of-force report if any force was used, even handcuffing under resistance. Record the decision to delay or continue the arrest and any paramedic advice. Report the medical event through the incident system and to the watch commander. If he is hospitalised, arrange a guard and notify the warrant holder.
Why: The record shows the arrest was lawful and the force proportionate; it supports continuity of care and protects against later claims. It also lets prosecutors and the court see why the connecting flight was missed. Do not write conclusions you cannot support; record facts and observations.