COSH SO2 study materials
COSH SO2 study resources

Pallet Falls from Racking in a Shared Forklift Aisle

COSH SO2 · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Pallet Falls from Racking in a Shared Forklift Aisle

At a 3,000 m² distribution warehouse in Kwai Chung, a pallet of canned goods fell from the third beam level of a 6 m high adjustable racking system at 14:05. It landed 0.8 m from an order picker who was walking under the racking to reach a pick face; no one was injured. The pallet overhung the beam by about 150 mm. A rack upright at bay 14 has a 40 mm dent at 1.2 m above floor. The beam safety clip is missing on the same bay. The site has seven counterbalance forklifts, aisles 3.2 m wide, 60 permanent staff and 12 agency workers. Pedestrians and forklifts share the same aisles; there are no marked walkways. The current risk assessment, dated 18 months ago, rates 'falling loads' as low risk with no further action. The warehouse manager wants to restart the 14:00 shift immediately and repair the rack at the weekend.

1. Identify the hazards and re-assess the falling-load risk. What factors make the existing 'low' rating unjustified?

Read the worked answer

Hazards: unstable or overhanging pallets; damaged rack upright; missing beam safety clip; forklift impact; pedestrians walking under racking and in aisles; poor visibility at rack ends; untrained agency workers; time pressure at shift change; possible overloading or misplacement of pallets.

Re-assessment: likelihood is high and severity is major because a falling pallet from 6 m can kill. The existing 'low' rating is unjustified for four reasons. First, the control relied on was simply 'careful stacking', with no engineering barrier and no inspection regime. Second, physical evidence contradicts the assumption: a 40 mm dent reduces the upright's load capacity, and a missing clip allows the beam to disengage. Third, the near miss occurred where pedestrians are permitted under racking, so exposure is routine, not exceptional. Fourth, the assessment is 18 months old and does not cover the 12 agency workers or the current aisle layout.

Conclusion: rate the risk as high until the bay is isolated and repaired. A near miss with no injury is a warning, not evidence of low risk; the next pallet may fall 0.8 m closer.

2. Set out a control plan using the hierarchy of control, with immediate, short-term and longer-term actions.

Read the worked answer

Immediate (today):

  • Close and barricade bay 14 and the adjacent pick face. Do not restart the shift in that aisle.
  • Offload the remaining pallets from the damaged bay with a forklift and a trained banksman, keeping pedestrians out of the exclusion zone.
  • Inspect all racking bays for dents, missing clips, beam deflection and overhang; tag defective bays.
  • Brief all staff and agency workers on the exclusion zone and the reporting of damaged racking.

Short term (this week):

  • Replace the damaged upright and missing clip using the rack manufacturer's parts; do not straighten a dented upright.
  • Re-stack pallets within the beam footprint, wrap or shrink-wrap unstable loads, and check pallet condition.
  • Mark pedestrian walkways, fit rack-end barriers and mirrors, set a 8 km/h speed limit, and separate forklift and pedestrian routes where possible.
  • Reissue the risk assessment and train agency workers before they work in the aisles.

Longer term:

  • Introduce a racking inspection regime with a competent person, damage tags and a repair log.
  • Review aisle width and layout; if pedestrians must enter aisles, use a permit or a 'forklift-free' picking time.
  • Include racking damage and near misses in monthly safety performance reviews.

Reasoning: engineering controls (repair, barriers, walkways) reduce the chance of a fall and the chance of a person being underneath. Training alone would not have prevented this near miss because the damaged rack and missing clip were physical defects.

3. How would you verify after three months that the controls are working?

Read the worked answer

Leading indicators: number of racking inspections completed on schedule; defective bays tagged and repaired within target time; percentage of agency workers inducted before aisle work; pedestrian walkway compliance observed; forklift speed data; near-miss reports per 100 workers; toolbox talk attendance.

Lagging indicators: falling-load incidents, rack impacts, first-aid cases, damage reports and insurance claims. A zero-accident month is not sufficient on its own because near misses may be under-reported.

Verification methods: walk the aisles at shift change when traffic is highest; interview pickers and agency workers privately; compare the risk assessment with what is actually done; sample CCTV; audit the repair log against the physical rack; check that the manager who wanted to restart the shift has not quietly reopened the bay.

Decision rule: if inspections are missed, if agency workers are found in aisles without induction, or if damaged bays remain in use, the controls are not working even if no one has been hurt. Escalate and revise the assessment.