ph-iata-dangerous-goods-air study materials
ph-iata-dangerous-goods-air study resources

ph-iata-dangerous-goods-air: Regulatory framework and applicability of the IATA DGR

ph-iata-dangerous-goods-air · Work through your exam, one topic at a time.

All guide sections

Regulatory framework and applicability of the IATA DGR

Domain 1 - Regulatory framework and applicability. This domain tests whether you can place the IATA DGR inside the legal chain, state when it applies, and allocate duties between shipper, forwarder and operator.

The chain of rules

  • The UN Model Regulations (Orange Book) set the international baseline for classification, packing, marking and documentation.
  • ICAO Annex 18 to the Chicago Convention obliges States to adopt the ICAO Technical Instructions (Doc 9284); national regulations implement them.
  • The IATA DGR is derived from the Technical Instructions, is more restrictive in specific places, and adds IATA requirements such as acceptance checklists and training provisions. IATA Resolution 618 makes the DGR binding on member airlines.
  • Where two applicable requirements differ, the more restrictive one governs. The DGR is reissued annually with effect from 1 January.

Scope and responsibility

  • The DGR applies to every dangerous goods consignment by air, plus operator's own property (Section 2.5), mail (2.4) and items carried by passengers or crew (2.3).
  • The shipper classifies, selects the proper shipping name, packs to the packing instruction, marks, labels, completes the Shipper's Declaration and supplies a 24-hour emergency number. A forwarder who signs as shipper accepts the same duties.
  • The operator accepts, loads, informs the captain and responds to incidents.

Worked example

A forwarder offers 4 × 5 L cans of UN 1263 Paint, Class 3, PG II. The DGR applies because the substance is listed and not excepted. The forwarder, acting as shipper, must classify and pack to the correct instruction, mark and label each outer packaging, declare the goods, and check the variation sets that touch the route. If it merely telephones the airline for verbal acceptance, the process has failed.

Traps that cost marks

  • Describing the DGR as law rather than as industry rules built on the ICAO Technical Instructions.
  • Forgetting that more restrictive requirements prevail over permissive ones.
  • Overlooking that operator's own stores, spares and passenger items are within scope.