ph-iata-dangerous-goods-air study materials
ph-iata-dangerous-goods-air study resources

ph-iata-dangerous-goods-air: Classification of dangerous goods

ph-iata-dangerous-goods-air · Work through your exam, one topic at a time.

All guide sections

Classification of dangerous goods

Domain 3 - Classification. The exam tests whether you can assign the correct class or division, subsidiary risk, packing group and proper shipping name from given properties or test data.

The nine classes

  • Class 1 explosives (divisions 1.1–1.6), Class 2 gases (2.1 flammable, 2.2 non-flammable non-toxic, 2.3 toxic), Class 3 flammable liquids, Class 4 (4.1 flammable solids, 4.2 spontaneously combustible, 4.3 dangerous when wet), Class 5 (5.1 oxidizers, 5.2 organic peroxides), Class 6 (6.1 toxic, 6.2 infectious), Class 7 radioactive, Class 8 corrosives, Class 9 miscellaneous.
  • Packing groups I, II and III express degree of danger and are not assigned to Classes 1, 2, 6.2 or 7.
  • Where several hazards exist, the precedence-of-hazard table decides the primary class; the other hazards become subsidiary risks and drive subsidiary labels.

Worked example

A liquid has a closed-cup flash point of 12 °C and an initial boiling point of 40 °C. It is a Class 3 flammable liquid. Because the initial boiling point is above 35 °C and the flash point is below 23 °C, it falls in Packing Group II, not PG I. If oral toxicity data also met the Class 6.1 criteria, the precedence table would decide whether Class 3 or 6.1 becomes primary, and a subsidiary label would be added.

Traps that cost marks

  • Assigning PG I whenever the flash point is low, without checking the boiling point criterion.
  • Using the lowest flash point from any source rather than validated test data.
  • Forgetting to record a subsidiary risk, then omitting the label and the declaration detail.
  • Treating Class 9 as unrestricted; lithium batteries, dry ice and magnetized material are Class 9 entries with real conditions.
  • Using a trade name as the proper shipping name instead of the DGL entry, for example choosing a brand name where a n.o.s. entry with a technical name is required.