PhilNITS FE study materials
PhilNITS FE study resources

PhilNITS FE: Management: Project, Service, Security, and Audit

PhilNITS FE · Work through your exam, one topic at a time.

All guide sections

Management: Project, Service, Security, and Audit

Domain scope

The Management domain covers the processes that keep IT delivery predictable and auditable: project management, service management, security management, and system audit. FE questions ask you to interpret earned-value figures, classify incidents and changes, or select the correct control in a risk scenario. The exam rewards knowing the purpose of each process and the direction of each metric.

Core rules to know

  • Project management: WBS, critical path (longest path, zero float), Gantt versus PERT, earned value management.
  • EVM: PV is planned value, EV is earned value, AC is actual cost. CV = EV - AC; SV = EV - PV; CPI = EV/AC; SPI = EV/PV.
  • Service management (ITIL): incident restores service; problem finds root cause; change is a controlled modification; release and deployment; SLA; service desk.
  • Security management: CIA triad, risk = likelihood x impact, preventive/detective/corrective controls, ISMS and ISO/IEC 27001, business continuity with RTO and RPO.
  • System audit: independence, evidence gathering, compliance versus substantive testing, audit trail.

Worked example

A task has PV = 100,000, EV = 80,000, and AC = 90,000. CV = 80,000 - 90,000 = -10,000, so the task is over budget. SV = 80,000 - 100,000 = -20,000, so it is behind schedule. CPI = 80,000 / 90,000 is approximately 0.89; SPI = 80,000 / 100,000 = 0.80. Both indices below 1 confirm that the task is behind schedule and spending more than the value earned.

Traps

  • Reversing the CV and SV formulas, or reading a negative CV as under budget.
  • Calling every user report a problem; an incident is the service interruption, while the problem is the underlying cause.
  • Confusing RTO (maximum tolerable downtime) with RPO (maximum tolerable data loss).
  • Treating an audit finding as an opinion rather than evidence-based nonconformity.