The Employer Wants a Full-Duty Date; the Wrist Has Not Settled
Andre is 44 and works on a poultry deboning line, 10-hour shifts, roughly 15 repetitions per minute with a knife. He has De Quervain tenosynovitis of the right wrist and a triggering right thumb, 10 weeks after a single corticosteroid injection. Finkelstein testing remains positive and he reports night pain that wakes him twice. He has been on modified duty (labeling, no knife) for six weeks. The physician's referral reads: “Please perform FCE; employer requesting full duty release.” Andre's QuickDASH is 55. The employer's nurse calls you directly asking for a date he can return to full duty and states the plant will hold his job only two more weeks. Andre says he is afraid of losing the job but cannot grip a knife for more than five minutes. Three visits remain on the authorization.
1. Should you perform a definitive functional capacity evaluation now, and how would you structure the assessment instead?
Read the worked answer
Reasoning: an FCE produces an interpretable ceiling only when effort is consistent and the condition is stable enough to be tested maximally. Andre is in an active, pain-limited phase - positive Finkelstein, night pain twice, QuickDASH 55 - so a single maximal session would generate a low, impressive-looking number that could be used to justify permanent restrictions below his true capacity.
Do instead:
- Job demands analysis first. Quantify what the line requires: 15 repetitions per minute, sustained 10-hour shifts, knife grip force, ulnar and radial deviation, cold environment, piece-rate pacing. Capacity without demand data is meaningless.
- Repeatable targeted testing across the remaining visits: grip and pinch dynamometry with coefficient of variation and positional consistency, timed work samples of knife-simulated gripping, observation of pain behavior and movement mechanics. Report current tolerance, not a maximum.
- Recommend a graded plan: a conditioning program with work simulation and a staged return (for example 4-hour modified days, knife tasks in 10-minute blocks with paced breaks, progressing on objective tolerance).
- Defer the formal FCE until inflammation settles, and request authorization to complete it then, while stating clearly in writing that the current absence of an FCE is not evidence of full capacity or of permanent disability.
2. How do you handle the call from the employer's nurse, including what you may and may not disclose?
Read the worked answer
Reasoning: two separate obligations collide here - the employer's need to plan and Andre's right to control information about his body and his care.
- Confirm authorization before the conversation. Ask for the signed release and confirm its scope: functional abilities and restrictions, not diagnosis, not treatment details, not prognosis. If there is no release, the call is limited to confirming that he is a patient and nothing more.
- Do not give a return-to-work date. Work status is the physician's determination. Say: “I can share functional findings and I will send them to Dr. X, who makes the work status decision.”
- Answer the pressure with facts, not defensiveness. If told the job is held only two weeks: “Andre's knife-work tolerance is currently about five minutes because of active tenosynovitis. I'm recommending graded duty and a conditioning program so he can build tolerance. I can't compress that timeline to fit a business cycle.”
- Coach Andre on his options - reasonable accommodation, family and medical leave, workers' compensation return-to-work provisions - and route him to the physician and a vocational resource rather than advising him yourself.
- Document the call: date, who called, exactly what was disclosed, and under what authorization. That record is your protection and his.
3. How do you document and code these services so they withstand review, given pressure for a favorable answer?
Read the worked answer
Documentation must show skilled reasoning, not just activity.
- Record objective data each visit: dynamometry values, repetitions completed before pain onset, duration tolerated, QuickDASH change, work-sample output. Include the clinical decision-making - why this progression, why he is not yet ready for full duty, what would change the plan.
- Never write conclusions without data. “Appears malingering” or “poor effort” without consistency testing is both unsupported and defamatory. If effort is inconsistent, report the specific indices.
- Code to what was done. Timed codes under the eight-minute rule: 97110 therapeutic exercise, 97112 neuromuscular re-education, 97530 therapeutic activity for work simulation, 97750 physical performance testing per 15 minutes, and work hardening codes only if the program genuinely meets the criteria. Do not bill a full FCE when a partial work sample was performed. Untimed evaluations are billed once, not per visit.
- Resist editing for the payer. If the employer or adjuster wants a different conclusion, the route is a factual discussion with the physician, not a revised report. Note the request in the record and escalate to a supervisor if pressure continues. Your signature is the evidence.