The Real Estate Agent's Cash
A Karachi brokerage, Crescent Capital, has a client, Mr. Farooq, a real estate agent and a senior official in a local municipal body. Over six weeks, he deposits PKR 9.6 million into his brokerage account through 14 cash deposits of PKR 600,000–750,000 at three bank branches. He then buys and sells shares rapidly, with little economic rationale, and transfers PKR 3.2 million to a cousin in Dubai. His account was opened online and the source-of-funds box was left blank. When compliance asks for evidence of the source of wealth, he becomes evasive and asks whether the broker will report him. The relationship manager says he is a good client and wants to keep him.
1. What CDD and EDD steps are required, and what red flags are present?
Read the worked answer
The client is a politically exposed person because he is a senior official in a municipal body, so enhanced due diligence is required: senior management approval, establishment of source of wealth and source of funds, and ongoing enhanced monitoring. The account-opening file is deficient because the source-of-funds box is blank and the account was opened online without apparent verification.
The red flags include 14 cash deposits just below a round reporting level, use of three bank branches, rapid in-and-out share trading with no clear investment strategy, an international transfer to a cousin in Dubai, evasiveness and a direct question about reporting. Structuring is a classic indicator; the broker should not treat each deposit in isolation.
The broker should obtain independent evidence of the real estate business, tax returns, bank statements and the identity of the Dubai recipient. It should verify whether the cousin is a beneficial owner or a nominee. If the client cannot explain the funds, the firm should consider restricting the account and filing a suspicious transaction report.
2. What reporting obligations apply, and what should the broker not do?
Read the worked answer
The broker should report the suspicious activity to the Financial Monitoring Unit promptly. It should not tell Mr. Farooq that a report has been or may be made; tipping off is prohibited. The relationship manager's desire to keep the client is not a valid reason to delay. The compliance officer should document the decision and the reasons, and continue monitoring the account.
The firm should preserve all records, including the account-opening file, deposit slips, trading records, correspondence and the Dubai transfer details. It should not close the account simply to avoid reporting, and it should not return the funds without proper instructions. If a regulator or law-enforcement agency requests information, the firm should cooperate within the legal framework.
The broker's obligation is not to prove crime; it is to report suspicion on reasonable grounds. The client's evasiveness and the structured deposits are enough to meet that threshold.
3. How should the firm handle the relationship manager's pushback?
Read the worked answer
Compliance should escalate the disagreement to senior management and, where appropriate, the audit or risk committee. The decision to file or not file must be made independently of business revenue. The relationship manager should be reminded that tipping off or suppressing a report can expose both the individual and the firm to penalties.
The firm should review whether the relationship manager's incentive structure encourages him to ignore red flags. It should also check whether other clients introduced by the same manager show similar patterns. The account should be placed on enhanced monitoring, and any further transactions should require compliance approval.
The reasoning is that AML/CFT controls fail when the first line of defence can overrule the second. The firm's defence should be a documented, independent decision based on the red flags, not a promise to a valuable client.