IFMP Stock Brokers Certification (SBC), Pakistan study materials
IFMP Stock Brokers Certification (SBC), Pakistan study resources

Onboarding an Overseas Joint Applicant with a Third-Party Fund Source

IFMP Stock Brokers Certification (SBC), Pakistan · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Onboarding an Overseas Joint Applicant with a Third-Party Fund Source

An Islamabad-based broker receives a new account application from a Pakistani citizen resident in Dubai. The applicant wants a joint account with his brother, who lives in Lahore and will place all orders. The file includes copies of both CNICs, a Dubai residence visa, a utility bill, and a bank statement from the brother showing a Rs 9 million balance. The applicant says the initial Rs 4 million will be wired from a cousin's account in Karachi because 'my Dubai bank transfer limit is low'. The broker's sales agent has already given the brother a demo of the trading terminal and taken a signed blank order form. Compliance notices that the cousin is not an account holder, the brother's address proof is six months old, and no source-of-income document has been obtained. The client insists on starting trading tomorrow because he expects a 'quick flip' in a textile stock.

1. What client due diligence and account-structure issues must compliance resolve before this account is activated? Address each applicant, the joint mandate, the cousin's funds, and the stale address proof.

Read the worked answer

Compliance should treat the file as incomplete and not activate trading. For each joint holder, verify identity with a current CNIC and, for the overseas applicant, residence and tax status; obtain a current address proof for the brother, not a six-month-old bill. Identify the beneficial owner and source of funds/wealth for the initial Rs 4 million. The cousin is not a client and is not a joint holder, so a transfer from the cousin is third-party funding; the broker should decline it and require funds from an account in the name of an account holder. Document the joint mandate: who may trade, whether instructions must be joint, and how cash/securities are withdrawn. Register the client/UIN with NCCPL and open the CDC sub-account in the correct name. Only after CDD, sanctions/PEP screening, and risk rating should the account be activated.

2. How should the broker handle the brother's request to place orders and the signed blank order form?

Read the worked answer

The brother may place orders only if the joint mandate expressly authorises him to do so. A signed blank order form is not acceptable: it lets anyone fill in price, quantity, or side later and destroys the audit trail. The broker should collect a written mandate, record the brother's specimen signature and authorised contact details, and require each order to be time-stamped and recorded in the order management system, whether by recorded line, portal, or signed ticket. The sales agent's terminal demo does not confer trading authority. If the mandate is 'either or survivor', clarify whether either holder can trade alone; if 'joint', both must instruct.

3. If the broker declines the cousin's transfer but the client proceeds through the brother's account, what monitoring and reporting obligations remain?

Read the worked answer

Even if the cousin's transfer is refused, the broker must monitor the account for third-party funding, unusual transfers, and rapid movement of funds against the stated profile. A Rs 4 million initial deposit from an unrelated source, a 'quick flip' expectation, and pressure to start immediately are risk indicators. If the broker knows or suspects that funds are proceeds of crime or that the client is evading exchange-control/AML rules, it must file a suspicious transaction report with the Financial Monitoring Unit and avoid tipping off the client. The broker should retain the CDD record, the declined-transfer rationale, and all order records. Continued monitoring should include source of subsequent deposits and beneficial ownership.