Reading a Bank's Growth: 22% Advances, 4% Profit and a 62% Coverage Ratio
A mid-sized Pakistani bank reports for FY2025: total assets PKR 850 billion (up 15%), gross advances PKR 520 billion (up 22%), deposits PKR 640 billion (up 9%), net interest margin 2.7% (FY2024: 3.4%), profit after tax PKR 9.1 billion (up 4%), ROE 14%, and cost-to-income 58%. Non-performing loans are 8.9% of advances (FY2024: 6.2%) and provision coverage is 62%. Restructured/rescheduled exposures stand at PKR 48 billion, of which PKR 22 billion were restructured in the last quarter. A deferred tax asset of PKR 6 billion is carried, and the available-for-sale investment portfolio shows an unrealised loss of PKR 11 billion against equity of PKR 65 billion. CASA is 62%. The CFO calls the result 'resilient' and points to a dividend maintained at last year's level. The bank is planning a PKR 15 billion tier-2 bond issue.
1. Reconstruct the earnings picture: compute ROA, advances-to-deposits, the NPL stock and the provision shortfall. What does this say about the quality of the 4% profit growth?
Read the worked answer
Computed picture
- ROA = 9.1 / 850 = 1.07%. A 14% ROE with a 1.07% ROA implies leverage of roughly 13x (equity ≈ 9.1 / 0.14 = PKR 65bn).
- Advances-to-deposits = 520 / 640 = 81.3%. Advances grew 22% against deposit growth of 9%, so the balance sheet was funded by borrowing or by running down liquidity - not by the deposit franchise.
- NPL stock = 8.9% × 520 = PKR 46.3bn. Provisions at 62% coverage = PKR 28.7bn. Shortfall to 100% coverage = PKR 17.6bn; to an 80% target = PKR 8.3bn.
- Restructured book of PKR 48bn is 9.2% of advances. If reclassified as NPL, the ratio becomes (46.3 + 48) / 520 = 18.1%.
Interpretation. Profit rose 4% because the book grew 22%, and margins were defended by volume while asset quality deteriorated faster than the book. A PKR 17.6bn top-up provision would exceed the PKR 9.1bn profit, so the reported growth is what remains after under-provisioning rather than a measure of sustainable earnings. The PKR 22bn restructured in the final quarter is a timing signal - it may be genuine client support, or it may be NPL avoidance dressed as forbearance. The 58% cost-to-income ratio shows no operating leverage was gained. The dividend is therefore being paid partly out of provisions not yet taken.
2. Identify the accounting policy and disclosure issues you would raise with management and the auditors, and explain why each matters.
Read the worked answer
Deferred tax asset, PKR 6bn. A DTA is recognised only to the extent that future taxable profits are probable. With NPL formation rising and NIM falling, that evidence is weakening. Ask for the forecasts and sensitivity behind the recognition. A write-down hits both capital and the rationale for the tier-2 issue.
AFS unrealised loss, PKR 11bn. If the portfolio is genuinely AFS, the loss sits in OCI rather than the P&L - but it still reduces equity by 11/65 = 17% and therefore reduces CAR. Ask whether any portion was reclassified to HTM to avoid the hit, and whether impairment was required for any credit-impaired issuer.
Restructuring. Income recognition and classification on restructured/rescheduled accounts are restricted by the Prudential Regulations. The question for management is what changed in the borrower's cash flow to justify each restructure, and whether it was done on commercial terms. If not, it is a non-performing exposure with a new label.
Disclosure and audit. Which provisions are specific and which general; whether markup on NPLs was suspended; whether the DTA and the AFS loss are disclosed with sensitivity; whether the auditor's key audit matters address the restructuring and the coverage ratio.
The number to put before the audit committee: a PKR 17.6bn coverage gap against PKR 9.1bn of profit. That single comparison reframes the whole set of accounts.
3. Would you subscribe to the PKR 15 billion tier-2 bond? Set out your analysis and the conditions precedent.
Read the worked answer
Analysis
- Capital. Equity of PKR 65bn, less the AFS loss of PKR 11bn (net of tax) and any DTA write-down of PKR 6bn, leaves roughly PKR 48–54bn. Tier-2 is eligible only up to a permitted share of tier-1 capital, so if tier-1 falls, the eligible amount falls too. Recompute CAR before and after these adjustments before discussing pricing.
- Asset quality. NPL formation of 270 bps in a year, with 9.2% of the book restructured, is a trajectory rather than an event. Request six quarters of slippage and recovery data.
- Earnings. At 62% coverage, future earnings are already committed to provisioning; a 1.07% ROA cannot absorb both provisioning and coupon without fresh capital.
- Structure. Check the terms for loss absorption, coupon suspension, maturity and call features; a subordinated instrument is not a deposit.
Conditions precedent
- A capital plan that shows CAR after the AFS loss and after DTA treatment.
- A written provisioning and restructuring policy consistent with the regulations.
- Auditor confirmation of classification and coverage.
- Covenants on NPL formation and coverage ratio, with a coupon step-up if breached.
Verdict: a high coupon is not compensation for missing disclosure - it is what you are paid for accepting it. If the bank will not disclose, do not subscribe.