PEC EPE Agricultural study materials
PEC EPE Agricultural study resources

Laser Levelling a Cotton Field with Shallow Topsoil

PEC EPE Agricultural · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Laser Levelling a Cotton Field with Shallow Topsoil

A 4 ha cotton field has been surveyed on a 20 m grid. Elevation ranges from 0.35 m high at the head to 0.00 m at the tail, with two depressions holding water after rain. The average cut to a plane at 0.15% slope is 0.12 m, and 30% of the area would be cut deeper than the 0.18 m topsoil layer. The soil is clay loam with a shallow hardpan at 0.25 m. Cotton yield is 750 kg/ha, seed cotton sells at PKR 200/kg, and the farmer estimates a 15% yield increase from uniform irrigation. Laser levelling costs PKR 250/m³ of earthwork, and topsoil stripping and replacement costs an extra PKR 80/m³. The farmer has a 10-day window before sowing and wants a dead-level field to reduce waterlogging.

1. Calculate the earthwork volume and the basic levelling cost. Compare a dead-level field with a 0.15% slope for this soil and crop.

Read the worked answer

Earthwork volume = area × average cut = 40,000 m² × 0.12 m = 4,800 m³. Basic levelling cost = 4,800 m³ × PKR 250/m³ = PKR 1,200,000.

A dead-level field is not appropriate here. The soil is clay loam with a shallow hardpan, and the field already has depressions that hold water. Dead level would reduce the ability of excess rain or irrigation water to drain, increasing waterlogging and salinity risk. A slope of about 0.15% is enough to move water to a tail drain without causing erosion on clay loam. The 0.15% plane is technically preferable, and the calculated 0.12 m average cut already refers to that plane.

2. Assess the topsoil loss risk and recommend how to protect the topsoil during levelling.

Read the worked answer

About 30% of the area would be cut deeper than the 0.18 m topsoil layer. In those cuts, the levelling operation would expose subsoil or hardpan, which has lower fertility, poorer structure, and lower infiltration. That is a serious yield risk for cotton, especially on clay loam.

Protection measures:

  1. Strip the top 0.18–0.20 m from the areas to be cut and stockpile it separately.
  2. Strip topsoil from the fill areas as well if fill depth is significant, or at least avoid burying good topsoil under deep fill.
  3. Level the subsoil to the design plane, then replace the stripped topsoil uniformly over the cut areas.
  4. Rip the hardpan to about 0.30–0.35 m before replacing topsoil if the hardpan is compacted, but do not mix subsoil into the topsoil.
  5. Avoid working when the soil is wet; clay loam is easily compacted.

The extra cost is not trivial: if topsoil is stripped over the whole 4 ha at 0.18 m, that is 7,200 m³, and the extra stripping/replacement cost at PKR 80/m³ is PKR 576,000. Even stripping only the cut areas would be substantial.

3. Decide whether to level the whole field now, split it, or postpone. Include the economics and the 10-day window in your recommendation.

Read the worked answer

Yield benefit: 750 kg/ha × 15% = 112.5 kg/ha. Over 4 ha: 450 kg. At PKR 200/kg, the added gross value is 450 × 200 = PKR 90,000 per year.

Basic levelling cost is PKR 1,200,000, and topsoil protection could add up to about PKR 576,000. Even ignoring the extra cost, simple payback is 1,200,000 / 90,000 ≈ 13.3 years. With topsoil protection, payback exceeds 19 years. Whole-field levelling is therefore not economically justified on this cotton yield alone, especially with the risk of exposing subsoil.

Recommendation: do not attempt whole-field dead-level levelling in the 10-day window. Instead, spot-level the two depressions and the worst high spots, maintain the 0.15% slope, and install a shallow tail drain. If the farmer wants full levelling, split the field into two or three sections and level one section per season after topsoil stripping, or hire a contractor with a laser scraper and a defined topsoil-management plan. Postpone full levelling until the economics improve or until a higher-value crop or waterlogging damage justifies it.