The Floating Lid and the Sinking Marble
Ms. Chen's second-grade class (22 students) is testing whether objects sink or float. The station includes a 22-cm plastic lid (18 g), a metal spoon (15 g), a glass marble (5 g), a wooden block (40 g), and a peeled orange (140 g). Before testing, most students state, "Heavy things sink." When the lid floats and the marble sinks, students are surprised. One student says, "The lid floats because it is flat and holds air." Another says, "The marble is small, so it should float." The wooden block floats; the peeled orange sinks, while an unpeeled orange floats. Ms. Chen has 25 minutes and a standard asking students to observe and compare whether objects sink or float. She worries that introducing density will confuse them but does not want to leave the misconception intact.
1. What is the likely source of the students' confusion, and what instructional move is developmentally appropriate for second graders?
Read the worked answer
The students are using a single, salient property-weight-as a rule for a phenomenon that depends on the relationship between an object's mass and the volume of water it pushes aside. The discrepant objects are valuable because they break the rule without requiring the formal density formula. For second graders, Ms. Chen should keep the language observational: "Does it push aside enough water to hold itself up?" She can use the lid and marble to show that size and weight alone do not predict floating, then test the shape idea directly. A short sequence with the same material-a ball of modeling clay that sinks and a boat-shaped piece of the same clay that floats-makes shape the variable. The peeled and unpeeled orange adds a second case: the peel traps air, changing the object without changing its overall size much. She should not lecture on density; she should let students revise their rule using evidence.
2. Design a quick follow-up investigation that tests the student's claim that the lid floats because it is flat and holds air.
Read the worked answer
A fair test would keep the material and mass as constant as possible while changing shape. Students can flatten a piece of aluminum foil and float it, then crumple the same-size piece into a tight ball and drop it in water. Alternatively, they can form two equal balls of modeling clay, leave one as a ball, and shape the other into a cup or boat. The key is to ask before each trial: "What is the same? What is different?" The foil or clay trials show that the same material can float or sink depending on shape, which supports the student's emerging idea about trapped air or displaced water. Ms. Chen can record the class results in a simple table: object, prediction, result, and one-word reason. She should ask the student who proposed the flatness idea to explain the foil result in their own words, positioning the student as a theory-builder rather than someone who was simply wrong.
3. How should Ms. Chen assess whether students have moved beyond "heavy things sink" without penalizing them for not using the word density?
Read the worked answer
She should look for a revised rule that incorporates evidence, not for a textbook definition. A proficient response might say, "Weight by itself doesn't decide it; the shape and what the object is made of matter too," or "The flat foil pushes more water and stays up." Ms. Chen can ask students to sort a new set of objects and give a reason for each placement, then compare their reasons with their earlier predictions. She can also use a quick written prompt: "A big heavy log floats. A small heavy coin sinks. How can both be true?" The assessment should value the use of evidence and the willingness to revise an idea. She should note whether students still rely only on weight, whether they can name more than one factor, and whether they can connect a prediction to an observed result. This gives her information for the next lesson without turning a second-grade exploration into a vocabulary quiz.