Records Request, Divorce, and Subpoena
Dr. Reyes, a school psychologist, has been counseling Sofia, a 16-year-old, for anxiety for 10 weeks. Sofia’s parents are divorced. Her mother has educational rights; her father has visitation. The father emails requesting “all counseling notes and test protocols” and says he will bring a subpoena if not provided by Friday. Sofia’s mother calls and says the father is “controlling” and demands that the records be withheld. Sofia says she does not want her father to see what she told Dr. Reyes. The file contains: (a) a psychoeducational report; (b) progress notes with brief psychotherapy notes; (c) test protocols, including the WISC-V; and (d) a safety plan. The district’s records custodian asks Dr. Reyes to send everything to avoid litigation.
1. Identify which records are education records and how the request should be handled.
Read the worked answer
The district should not simply send everything, nor should it withhold everything. Each category needs separate analysis.
- Psychoeducational report: This is an education record. The parent with educational rights generally has a right to inspect and review it. The father’s rights depend on the divorce decree and district policy; the district should verify who has educational decision-making authority.
- Progress notes/psychotherapy notes: These may be education records if they are maintained in the student’s file or shared with school staff. Sole-possession notes may be excluded only if they meet the narrow exception and have not been shared. Because these notes are described as psychotherapy notes, the district should consult policy and legal counsel before releasing them.
- Test protocols: Protocols are generally part of the education record and parents may inspect them, though the district may protect test security and copyright by supervising review rather than copying. It should not refuse inspection outright.
- Safety plan: Likely an education record and relevant to the parent’s request; redact third-party information if necessary.
The district should acknowledge the request in writing, verify authority, and respond within the required timeline. It should not destroy records or release them informally by email without following records procedures.
2. How should the subpoena and the parents’ conflict be addressed?
Read the worked answer
A subpoena should go to the district’s legal counsel or records custodian, not be handled informally by the psychologist alone.
- Do not ignore the subpoena, but do not release records until counsel reviews it and confirms proper authority and any protections.
- Notify the mother as the parent with educational rights and give her an opportunity to object or seek a protective order.
- Verify the father’s legal rights. Divorce decrees vary; visitation does not automatically equal educational records rights.
- Redact third-party information and anything not responsive.
- Maintain the therapeutic relationship with Sofia by explaining, at an appropriate level, that the district must follow legal procedures and that her concerns are being taken seriously.
The psychologist should avoid becoming the arbiter of the parents’ divorce conflict. The role is to provide accurate information to the records custodian and legal counsel.
3. How would you respond to Sofia’s objection and the request for counseling notes?
Read the worked answer
Sofia’s objection deserves weight, but it does not automatically override a parent’s legal rights to education records.
I would:
- Talk with Sofia about what she is worried her father will see and why. Explore whether a summary or redacted information could address the concern.
- Explain the limits of confidentiality in school-based counseling, including that parents may have rights to records.
- Avoid promising secrecy I cannot guarantee.
- Consult with legal counsel about whether the psychotherapy notes are education records and whether any privilege or sole-possession exception applies.
- Consider a release or agreement if the parents and student are willing, but do not pressure Sofia to consent.
- Document the discussion and the rationale for the district’s response.
The key is to balance legal obligations, the parents’ rights, and Sofia’s therapeutic trust without making an unauthorized unilateral decision to withhold records.