Designing Assessment for a Performance-Based Speech Unit
A speech teacher is finishing a four-week unit on informative speaking with a class of 26 students. The summative assessment is a 5-minute speech delivered live, scored on a department rubric covering organization, evidence, delivery, and audience adaptation. Two students have documented anxiety disorders and have requested an alternative to live delivery. One student has an IEP accommodation for extended time. The teacher has one week of class time for presentations and a policy that all students must present publicly at least once per semester. The principal wants "consistent standards" across sections. The teacher is unsure whether recorded delivery, a smaller audience, or a written outline substitute best preserves the rubric's validity.
1. Evaluate the three proposed alternatives against the rubric's constructs and the policy constraint.
Read the worked answer
The key question is construct validity: does the alternative measure the same skills the rubric names?
- Recorded delivery: preserves organization, evidence, and most delivery features (voice, pacing, gesture) but removes live audience adaptation and immediacy. It is the strongest substitute for the delivery construct if the recording is unedited and submitted with a time stamp.
- Smaller audience: preserves live delivery and audience adaptation while reducing anxiety load. This is the least invasive accommodation because the construct is essentially unchanged; it should be the first option offered.
- Written outline substitute: valid for organization and evidence, but it does not measure delivery or audience adaptation at all. Using it as a full substitute would make the rubric's delivery criteria unassessable and would not satisfy a public-presentation policy.
Policy constraint: a smaller-audience live delivery still satisfies "present publicly." A recorded speech may or may not, depending on how the policy defines public; the teacher should confirm. The outline substitute likely does not satisfy it.
2. How should the teacher document and defend the accommodation decisions to satisfy the principal's "consistent standards" concern?
Read the worked answer
The teacher should show that standards are consistent while access is individualized-the same rubric and criteria apply, with documented adjustments to conditions.
Documentation:
- Cite each student's documented need (IEP/504 or medical note) and the specific accommodation requested.
- Record which rubric criteria are affected and how the alternative preserves them (e.g., "smaller audience: all four criteria assessed live").
- Note any criterion that cannot be fully assessed and how it will be evidenced otherwise (e.g., a follow-up conference for audience adaptation).
- Apply the extended-time accommodation to the speaking task by adjusting preparation or scheduling, not by lowering the standard.
Defense to the principal:
- Point to the unchanged rubric as the consistent standard; accommodations change conditions, not criteria.
- Offer a department-wide protocol so other sections handle similar requests the same way-this directly answers "consistency across sections."
- Keep decisions reviewable and in writing so they are defensible and equitable, not ad hoc favors.
Equity check: offer the smaller-audience option to any student who requests it, so the accommodation is not stigmatizing.