Praxis Technology Education study materials
Praxis Technology Education study resources

Solar Greenhouse Fan Sizing

Praxis Technology Education · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Solar Greenhouse Fan Sizing

A high school sustainable energy class is designing a solar-powered ventilation system for a small greenhouse. The fan draws 0.45 A at 12 V and must run 8 hours per day. The site receives an average of 4.2 peak sun hours per day in spring. The team proposes one 30 W panel, a 12 V 20 Ah sealed lead-acid battery, and a charge controller. The panel's rated output is at standard test conditions; system losses are estimated at 25%. The battery should not be discharged below 50% state of charge. The teacher wants the design to work for a three-day cloudy period and to be safe for students to maintain. The team's first calculation says the panel is oversized because 30 W is greater than the fan's 5.4 W. The team has a $150 budget and cannot add a second panel unless the battery is reduced.

1. Calculate daily energy, panel yield, and battery capacity for three cloudy days. Is the proposed system adequate? Show your work.

Read the worked answer

Fan power is 12 V times 0.45 A, or 5.4 W. Daily energy is 5.4 W times 8 hours, or 43.2 Wh per day. Panel yield is 30 W times 4.2 peak sun hours times 0.75 for losses, which equals 94.5 Wh per day. On an average day, the panel produces more than the load, so the team's instinct that there is margin is partly right, but the comparison of 30 W with 5.4 W is not a valid energy comparison.

Battery storage is 12 V times 20 Ah, or 240 Wh total. At 50 percent depth of discharge, usable energy is 120 Wh. A three-day load is 3 times 43.2 Wh, or 129.6 Wh. Therefore the proposed battery is not adequate for three days without solar; it is short by 9.6 Wh even before aging and cold effects. The minimum nominal capacity at 50 percent depth is 129.6 Wh divided by 12 V divided by 0.5, or 21.6 Ah. A 30 Ah or larger battery would give realistic margin. The panel may be acceptable on average but should be checked for recharge after a cloudy period.

2. Explain the team's error in comparing 30 W with 5.4 W and how to present the design to the teacher.

Read the worked answer

The 30 W rating is instantaneous panel power at standard test conditions, not energy delivered all day. The fan's 5.4 W is also instantaneous, but it runs for 8 hours. Comparing the two numbers ignores time, duty cycle, and system losses. The correct comparison is daily watt-hours: about 43.2 Wh consumed versus about 94.5 Wh produced on an average spring day. That still does not prove reliability, because cloudy days and battery autonomy must be included.

The team should present an energy budget table with load power, hours, daily Wh, panel yield, losses, battery usable Wh, and days of autonomy. Then state the weakest component: the 20 Ah battery fails the three-day requirement. Recommend a larger battery or a reduced fan schedule, and show the tradeoff with the $150 budget. This presentation demonstrates engineering reasoning rather than a single misleading power comparison.

3. Identify two safety or maintenance concerns for a student-maintained 12 V lead-acid system and propose one design change that addresses them.

Read the worked answer

A sealed lead-acid battery can still release hydrogen if overcharged or abused, and it contains acid and high short-circuit current. Students should not work on exposed terminals or charge equipment in an unvented enclosure. A second concern is wiring and fusing: a 12 V battery can heat a small wire or cause a fire if shorted, so the circuit needs an appropriately rated fuse close to the battery, strain relief, and clear polarity markings. The charge controller must be set for lead-acid and rated for the panel's short-circuit current.

One design change is to place the battery in a locked, vented battery box with a fuse holder at the positive terminal and labeled disconnect switch. Terminals should be covered, and maintenance should be limited to trained students under supervision. The panel and controller should be mounted so cables cannot be pulled or pinched. This addresses the most likely student-maintenance hazards without changing the educational purpose of the system.