Praxis World Languages Pedagogy study materials
Praxis World Languages Pedagogy study resources

Praxis World Languages Pedagogy: Instructional Planning and Curriculum Design Aligned to Standards

Praxis World Languages Pedagogy · Work through your exam, one topic at a time.

All guide sections

Instructional Planning and Curriculum Design Aligned to Standards

Instructional Planning and Curriculum Design Aligned to Standards

This domain tests backward design, standards alignment, thematic planning, and proficiency-appropriate targets. Items often ask what to do first when planning a unit or how to align assessments with ACTFL and local standards.

Core rules and concepts

  • Start with the end: identify desired results, then acceptable evidence, then learning experiences. Do not begin with a favorite activity.
  • Anchor units in the ACTFL World-Readiness Standards and the five Cs: Communication, Cultures, Connections, Comparisons, and Communities.
  • Write can-do objectives tied to a proficiency level and a mode of communication. A novice goal might be 'I can identify main ideas in a short menu,' not 'students will master food vocabulary.'
  • Organize by themes and authentic tasks, not by a grammar sequence. Grammar and vocabulary are tools for the unit's communicative goals.
  • Build in the three modes: interpretive, interpersonal, and presentational. A balanced unit assesses all three rather than only writing.
  • Align assessments before activities; otherwise the unit may test something never practiced.

Worked example

A teacher plans a food unit. Backward design begins with the summative IPA: students interpret a short restaurant review, role-play ordering with a partner, and present a simple food guide. The teacher then selects standards, can-do statements, and formative tasks such as sorting menu items and rehearsing a complaint. The reasoning: each activity points to a required performance, and the grammar focus emerges from what students need to order and describe.

Traps that cost marks

  • Listing activities first and attaching standards afterward.
  • Writing vague cultural objectives such as 'students will appreciate culture.'
  • Planning only grammar tests for a communicative unit.
  • Setting targets above or below the learners' proficiency level.
  • Forgetting that presentational and interpersonal tasks require different preparation.