Register and Task Completion in Interpersonal Writing
Mr. Delgado's Spanish 4 class completes an interpersonal writing task: reply to an email from a school principal in Morelia asking about a student's upcoming absence. The prompt specifies that the reply must use formal register. One student, Priya, writes a warm, fluent 90-word reply using “tú,” emojis, and “¡Hola!” Her grammar and vocabulary are strong. The rubric has separate categories for task completion, comprehensibility, vocabulary, grammar, and register. A second student writes a 25-word reply that is perfectly formal and accurate but says almost nothing. Mr. Delgado is unsure whether Priya's response should receive full credit because her language is otherwise excellent, and whether the short formal reply is adequate.
1. How should Priya's response be scored on register and overall?
Read the worked answer
Register should be scored as its own dimension, not folded into grammar. Priya has made a sociolinguistic error, not a grammatical one: she chose “tú,” emojis, and an informal greeting for a principal. On a register row, that is partial credit at best, because the audience is wrong for the text.
Overall, she should not receive top marks, because interpersonal writing requires both language and appropriateness to the audience and purpose. Her fluency does not cancel the register problem. The teacher should cite evidence: “¡Hola!” and “tú” address a peer, not a principal. The score should reflect that the message is comprehensible and well developed but misaligned with the relationship.
2. A second student writes a very short but perfectly formal reply of 25 words. Is that adequate?
Read the worked answer
No. Formal register is necessary but not sufficient. The task is interpersonal writing, so the reply must also accomplish the purpose: acknowledge the principal's message, explain the absence, and provide any needed detail or courtesy. A 25-word reply that is formal but empty may score well on register and grammar yet poorly on task completion and elaboration.
The teacher should check the rubric: if task completion is a separate row, the short reply cannot earn full credit there. If the rubric rewards only accuracy, it is misaligned with the prompt.
3. What feedback would improve register without discouraging Priya?
Read the worked answer
Use a contrastive audience analysis rather than a general correction. For example:
- Show two versions of the same sentence: one to a friend, one to a principal.
- Ask Priya to identify which words mark the relationship (greeting, pronoun, closing).
- Have her revise only the opening and closing, keeping her strong content.
This treats register as a learnable choice, not a character flaw. It also preserves her fluency while making the sociolinguistic target explicit.