Reconciling Three Sources for a Rent-Assistance Application
You are a records clerk at a community services agency. A rent-assistance application is due tomorrow at noon. The client's file contains three conflicting items. The March 3 intake form lists a household of four and monthly income of $2,150. An April 18 phone note says, 'Income now about $2,400; one roommate moved out.' A scanned pay stub dated March 28 shows gross pay of $1,190 for a two-week period. The policy manual says to use the most recent verifiable documentation for income and household size as of the application date. Your supervisor is out. The client left a voicemail: 'The phone note is wrong-there are five of us now, and I get paid weekly.' The application portal locks at noon; no exceptions. You have two hours before the end of your shift.
1. Identify the first three information-gathering actions you would take, in order. Explain why each step comes before the next.
Read the worked answer
Order matters because the policy turns on verification and dates.
- Call the client first. Confirm the current household members, the pay frequency, and whether she has pay stubs from the last four weeks. This is the fastest way to learn whether the voicemail changes the income figure; it also avoids pulling a third-party report before I know what is missing.
- Request dated documents. Ask for the most recent weekly pay stubs and a lease or household statement. The policy requires 'verifiable documentation,' so a phone note alone will not do. I would tell her the portal closes at noon and offer to accept photos by a stated time.
- Verify with the employer only if needed and permitted. If the client cannot produce stubs, use a signed release and call payroll. This comes last because it is slower and involves privacy; it should not delay collecting what the client already has.
I would not start by averaging the three numbers or by choosing the highest one; both would invent a rule the policy does not contain.
2. The three income figures conflict. Which income figure would you use, and what would you do if verification does not arrive before the deadline?
Read the worked answer
Use the most recent verifiable income figure, not the most recent unverified statement. The March 28 stub is verifiable but may be stale; the April 18 phone note is recent but unverified. The client's voicemail says she is paid weekly, which makes the stub's 'two-week period' label especially important to confirm-if it is actually a weekly stub, the monthly figure changes substantially.
I would request the latest weekly stubs. If they arrive before noon, use those and recalculate the monthly amount consistently. If they do not arrive, I would use the March 28 stub as the latest verifiable documentation, attach a note that a more recent figure is pending, and flag the file for follow-up. I would not use the $2,400 phone estimate because it conflicts with the client's own voicemail and cannot be verified. If the portal will not accept a pending note, I would submit the verified figure and document the discrepancy rather than delay the application past the deadline.
3. Write the case note you would leave, including what you did not resolve.
Read the worked answer
Case note (draft):
Date/time: [today], 10:15 a.m. Application due [date] at noon. Reviewed intake form (3/3), phone note (4/18), and pay stub (3/28). Client called at 10:05 a.m.; states household now has five members and that she is paid weekly, not biweekly. Voicemail and phone note conflict with each other; neither is verified. Requested current weekly pay stubs and proof of household composition by 11:30 a.m. If received, recalculate income and update application. If not received, use 3/28 stub as latest verifiable documentation, note that it may understate or overstate current income, and flag for post-submission review. Did not use $2,400 phone estimate. Household size remains four on verified documents until client provides proof of fifth member. Supervisor unavailable; no policy exception requested. Follow-up: call client at 11:35 a.m.; ask supervisor to review discrepancy and document decision.