Alcohol Withdrawal, a Refusal, and a Brother Who Wants to Take Him Home
Mr. R is 45 and is brought to the emergency department by a neighbor after falling at home. He has a 4 cm forehead laceration and smells of alcohol. He is alert, oriented to person, place, and time, answers questions appropriately, and states clearly that he wants to go home with his brother. His heart rate is 116, blood pressure 162/96, temperature 37.2 °C, and both hands are trembling. He says he sees 'shadows moving' at the edge of the room. He reports his last drink was 'sometime yesterday.' His CIWA-Ar score was 14 initially and is 17 on reassessment. He refuses lorazepam and thiamine, saying, 'I've been sober six months; I don't need that stuff.' His brother arrives demanding to take him home, saying, 'He can't consent to anything when he's drunk - just treat him.' There are no monitored beds available.
1. Does Mr. R have the right to refuse treatment and leave? Reason through capacity rather than assuming intoxication equals incapacity.
Read the worked answer
Intoxication alone does not remove decision-making capacity, and a smell of alcohol is not a capacity assessment.
The elements of capacity, applied here:
- Understanding - he can restate that he is in withdrawal, that stopping alcohol abruptly can cause seizures, and what lorazepam and thiamine are for. Test this with teach-back; do not assume.
- Appreciation - can he connect the risk to himself, not just recite it?
- Reasoning - can he compare options, including staying for treatment versus leaving now?
- Consistent choice - his stated wish is stable across the conversation, not wavering with each question.
He is oriented to person, place, and time and converses appropriately, which supports capacity; the visual disturbance is concerning but does not by itself settle the question. Capacity is also decision-specific: he may be able to refuse a benzodiazepine and not be able to refuse care for a head injury.
Actions: ask the emergency physician to document a formal capacity assessment and a head-injury evaluation for the fall, since he is on no anticoagulant but did strike his forehead. Explain the risks in plain language, offer alternatives (oral rather than IV medication, a smaller dose, a shorter observation period), and document exactly what was offered, what he said, and who witnessed it. If he still refuses and has capacity, honor it, provide a written withdrawal warning sheet and follow-up resources, and document the informed refusal. Do not physically restrain him and do not sedate him against his will as a workaround. If capacity is absent or he deteriorates, escalate to the physician for an emergency hold under your state's statute.
2. His brother says, 'Just treat him - he can't consent when he's drunk.' How do you respond, and what is your plan for the family?
Read the worked answer
The patient is the decision-maker until a clinician documents otherwise.
- A family member cannot consent on behalf of a competent adult, no matter how well-intentioned, and cannot override a capable refusal. Say this plainly and without condescension: 'Your brother has been clear with me about what he wants. I can't treat him against his wishes, but I can tell you exactly what worries me and what you can do.'
- Do not share clinical details beyond what the patient permits. Ask Mr. R whether he wants his brother included in the conversation, and document his answer.
- Use the brother as an ally. He is frightened, and he may succeed where you did not: he can reinforce the seizure and delirium risk, help remove alcohol from the home, and drive him to follow-up.
Concrete family plan:
- Give both of them the warning signs that mean call 911 - a seizure, heavy vomiting, confusion that worsens, hallucinations, fever, or inability to keep fluids down.
- Provide the local detoxification or crisis line, a same-day or next-day appointment, and a plan for who stays with him tonight.
- If he leaves, escort them out, note the time, the mode of departure, and the patient's stated plan, and document the brother's acceptance of the plan.
- Tell the brother to bring him back immediately if anything on the warning list occurs, and reassure him that returning will not be treated as a failure.
3. Assume he agrees to stay. What are your priorities for the first eight hours?
Read the worked answer
Treat withdrawal, protect the airway and the brain, and prevent the predictable complications.
- Symptom-triggered benzodiazepines. Score with CIWA-Ar at set intervals and medicate per protocol rather than on a fixed schedule. A score of 17 with hallucinations warrants treatment now; if he will not take oral lorazepam, ask the physician about an alternative route rather than skipping the dose.
- Thiamine before or with glucose. Give thiamine first in any patient at risk for poor nutrition; glucose without thiamine can precipitate Wernicke encephalopathy. Add folate and check magnesium and potassium, which are commonly low and lower the seizure threshold.
- Seizure and delirium precautions. Quiet, well-lit room, low stimulation, frequent reorientation, bed low with pads, call light in reach, and fall precautions. Do not use restraints; they increase agitation and injury risk. Reassess the forehead laceration and watch for signs of head injury.
- Monitor the timeline. Tremor and autonomic hyperactivity peak early; delirium tremens typically appears 48 to 96 hours after the last drink, so a stable first eight hours does not mean the crisis has passed. Track heart rate, blood pressure, temperature, and fluid balance.
- Hydration and nutrition as tolerated; monitor for vomiting and aspiration.
- Escalate for a temperature above 38 °C, sustained tachycardia, a seizure, or worsening confusion - these are intensive-care-level findings.
- Document every score, dose, refusal, and response, and hand off the trend rather than a single number.