RICP study materials
RICP study resources

A Widow With Early Cognitive Decline: Building an Income Floor She Can Actually Operate

RICP · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

A Widow With Early Cognitive Decline: Building an Income Floor She Can Actually Operate

Maria, 70, was widowed three years ago. She has $600,000 in an IRA, $100,000 in a taxable account (including a variable annuity with a $60,000 cash value and a 1.9% mortality and expense charge), $50,000 in cash, and a paid-off condo worth $420,000. Social Security pays $2,800 a month; there is no pension. Essential expenses, including a Medicare supplement and prescriptions, are $4,500 a month; she also gives the grandchildren about $600 a month and wants to formalize $10,000 a year in gifts. She has no long-term care insurance. Her daughter lives 20 minutes away and holds a general power of attorney. Maria's mother lived to 97. Maria has begun repeating questions and missed two credit card payments last quarter. She wants 'everything in one simple account.' She holds nine mutual funds and three CDs.

1. Assess sustainability and design the structure that should fund her essential expenses.

Read the worked answer

The arithmetic is not the problem. Essentials of $54,000 less $33,600 of Social Security leave a $20,400 gap, or 2.7% of $750,000 of liquid assets. Adding the $10,000 of gifts takes it to $30,400, or 4.1%. On averages, the plan holds.

The risks are elsewhere:

  • Longevity - her mother lived to 97, so plan for 27+ years, with the highest spending in the final decade.
  • Long-term care - no coverage. Three years at $110,000 is $330,000, or 44% of her liquid assets, in a single event.
  • Capacity - missed payments and repeated questions mean the plan must run without her judgment and must resist a persuasive salesperson.

Structure, in priority order:

  1. Liability-match the gap. About $200,000 in a 10-year Treasury, TIPS, or CD ladder covering $20,400 a year. Essentials come off the table before anything else is decided.
  2. Consider a small deferred income annuity starting at 85, when the ladder runs out and outliving assets is the dominant risk. Price it rather than assume; a low-six-figure premium can cover the gap for life and is the cheapest hedge against living to 97.
  3. Remainder (~$550,000) in two or three low-cost funds at 40/60 or 50/50 - growth for the long horizon without requiring active decisions.
  4. Cap gifts at $10,000 and label them discretionary, revisable the moment care costs appear.

2. What planning, documentation, and process steps should accompany the portfolio changes?

Read the worked answer

The allocation is the easy half; continuity of management is the point of the case.

  • Consolidate to one custodian and one adviser of record. Nine funds, three CDs, and a variable annuity across institutions is the mechanism that produced the missed payments.
  • Automate: Social Security deposit, bill pay for the Medicare supplement and utilities, and an automatic distribution once RMDs begin at 73.
  • Capacity documents now, not later. Update the durable power of attorney and health care directive while her capacity is not in question, add a trusted contact, and document the conversation in the file. Consider a funded revocable trust with the daughter as successor trustee if the goal is management continuity; a trust is not needed for tax reasons at this asset level.
  • Beneficiary designations: confirm the IRA and annuity name the daughter, or the trust, and are not stale from the husband's death. These accounts pass by designation, not by will.
  • Gifts and Medicaid: $10,000 is under the annual exclusion, so no gift tax return is required. But any gift within five years of a Medicaid application creates a penalty period. Keep a ledger, and stop gifting the moment a care need appears.

3. What should be done with the variable annuity and the nine mutual funds?

Read the worked answer

The variable annuity is $60,000 of a $100,000 taxable account - 60% of her taxable liquidity sitting in the most expensive and least transparent product she owns. Check three things before acting: the surrender charge schedule, whether any living benefit is actually being used, and the gain relative to basis.

  • If surrender charges have expired and the gain is modest, surrendering simplifies the plan; gains come out as ordinary income, so compute the tax first, and a contract with a loss produces an ordinary deduction.
  • If the gain is large, a 1035 exchange to a low-cost variable annuity preserves deferral without triggering tax, and is the better answer than paying ordinary rates to reinvest.
  • Either way, 1.9% of mortality and expense charges is roughly $1,140 a year before fund expenses - a permanent drag on a portfolio that must last 27 years.

The nine funds should be collapsed inside the IRA, where consolidation triggers no tax. In the taxable account, sell only lots with small gains or offsetting losses, and avoid realizing gains that would raise her MAGI for Medicare purposes.

The judgment being tested: for a client with early cognitive decline, a simpler, cheaper, slightly less optimal portfolio beats a sophisticated one she cannot operate - and any product with a long surrender period should be treated as a liability, not a solution.