Surrender After a Missed Check-In
Priya writes a $30,000 surety bond for Andre on a contract requiring weekly check-ins; the contract says 'any violation permits surrender.' Andre misses two check-ins. His mother calls Priya and explains Andre was hospitalized with a collapsed lung and will be released in three days. Priya does not verify. On Friday she arrests Andre at his mother's house and surrenders him to the county jail. The bond is discharged. Priya keeps $3,000 collateral posted by the mother and bills her $600 'surrender fee,' which is not mentioned in the contract. The mother co-signed the indemnity agreement.
1. Was the surrender proper? What facts and contract terms control?
Read the worked answer
The contract gives Priya a surrender right for 'any violation,' and missed check-ins are a violation on the face of the document. But a contractual right must be exercised in good faith and for a bond-related purpose, not arbitrarily. The mother gave a specific, verifiable explanation: hospitalization and a release date three days later. Priya did not check the hospital, the jail, or Andre's location before arresting him at his mother's house.
A reasonable bondsman would verify the hospitalization and consider whether a short delay, a phone check-in, or a written explanation would protect the surety without incarceration. Surrender is not automatically improper, but the timing and failure to investigate are evidence that Priya used the surrender power as leverage or punishment rather than risk management. The court and the Department can review whether the surrender was justified under the circumstances.
2. Analyze the $600 'surrender fee' and the $3,000 collateral.
Read the worked answer
The $600 surrender fee is not in the contract. A bondsman cannot bill a new fee after the fact simply because a surrender occurred; the fee must be disclosed and agreed to in writing, and it must be reasonable and tied to actual work. Because the mother co-signed the indemnity agreement, she may be liable for authorized premiums and costs, but not for an undisclosed charge.
The $3,000 collateral was security for the bond, not a penalty. Once Andre was surrendered and the bond discharged, Priya's exposure ended. She must account for the collateral, return any excess promptly, and provide a written statement of any authorized offsets. Keeping the full $3,000 with no accounting and no contractual basis looks like conversion. If she incurred actual, documented costs permitted by the indemnity agreement, she must show them.
3. What records should Priya have created, and what should happen to the collateral and the co-signer obligation?
Read the worked answer
Priya should have documented the two missed check-ins, the mother's hospitalization explanation, the steps she took to verify it, the date and location of the arrest, the surrender paperwork, and the discharge of the bond. She should also have a collateral ledger showing the $3,000 receipt, any disbursements, and the return. A written notice to the mother and co-signer explaining the surrender and the accounting would have reduced the dispute.
Now she should produce an accounting, return the $3,000 unless she can document authorized offsets, and cancel the $600 fee. The mother's co-signer obligation extends to authorized premium and indemnity claims, not to invented fees. If Priya believes the hospitalization was false, she should say so with evidence; otherwise the file supports a finding of bad-faith surrender and improper retention.