The Certificate That Promised Additional-Insured Status
Mesa Mechanical has a CGL policy with a blanket additional-insured endorsement that applies only when Mesa has agreed in a written contract to add another party. Mesa's insurance agent issues a certificate of insurance to Northgate Builders stating that Northgate is an additional insured on Mesa's policy. There is no written contract between Mesa and Northgate; the parties exchanged emails, but none mentions insurance or additional-insured status. A Northgate employee is injured by Mesa's work, and Northgate is sued. Mesa's insurer denies additional-insured status. Northgate's own CGL insurer defends under a reservation of rights and demands that Mesa's agent fix the certificate. The agent says, 'A certificate is just evidence; it doesn't create coverage.'
1. Is Northgate an additional insured under Mesa's policy? Explain.
Read the worked answer
Probably not. The blanket additional-insured endorsement applies only when Mesa has agreed in a written contract to add another party. The emails do not mention insurance or additional-insured status, so the condition is not met. A certificate of insurance is evidence of coverage; it is not the policy and generally cannot expand coverage or create a contract term that the policy requires. The agent's statement is legally accurate in the usual case, even though the certificate was misleading.
2. What is the agent's professional and legal exposure, and what should the agent have done?
Read the worked answer
The agent faces errors-and-omissions exposure for negligently issuing a certificate that stated additional-insured status when the policy required a written contract. The agent should have:
- Reviewed the subcontract or purchase order.
- Confirmed the written contract required additional-insured status.
- Checked the endorsement wording and effective dates.
- Issued the certificate only after the policy actually provided the status, or clearly labeled it as information only and disclosed the gap.
The agent should now notify its E&O carrier, correct the certificate in writing, and cooperate with both insurers. A regulator could also view the certificate as a misrepresentation if it was issued carelessly.
3. How should Northgate's insurer and Mesa's insurer coordinate defense? Include certificate versus policy language.
Read the worked answer
Northgate's CGL insurer should continue defending under a reservation of rights while it investigates whether any other insurance is primary. Mesa's insurer should defend Mesa if the claim alleges Mesa's work caused the injury, but it can deny additional-insured status to Northgate based on the policy's written-contract condition.
The certificate does not override the policy. The insurers should compare 'other insurance' clauses, tender the claim appropriately, and seek a declaratory judgment if they dispute priority. The agent's E&O carrier may need to participate if Northgate suffers an uncovered judgment because it relied on the erroneous certificate.