The Buyer Who Wanted Out After the Hammer
At a farm equipment auction, the caller says "Sold!" and points to Marla at $23,000 for a skid steer. Marla signs a buyer's ticket that states: "All items sold AS-IS, WHERE-IS. Buyer must pay in full by 5 p.m. today; 15% buyer's premium; removal by Friday or storage of $50/day." The auctioneer had announced before bidding that the machine "runs great." On Thursday, Marla discovers a cracked hydraulic block and refuses to pay, saying the auctioneer's statement was a warranty and that she was rushed into signing. The seller wants his money.
1. Evaluate Marla's claim that "runs great" created a warranty that overrides the AS-IS ticket. What facts drive the outcome?
Read the worked answer
The AS-IS/WHERE-IS language is strong but not automatically bulletproof against an affirmative factual statement by the auctioneer. The analysis turns on:
- What was actually said and whether it was an opinion or a specific factual claim. "Runs great" is closer to sales puffery/opinion than a specific guarantee of a component's condition, but if it was stated as a factual assurance about the machine's operating condition, a buyer may argue it became part of the basis of the bargain.
- Whether the AS-IS terms were conspicuous and disclosed before bidding, not sprung at signing. If announced and displayed before bids, they are more likely enforceable.
- Whether Marla had a chance to inspect. As-is sales shift the inspection burden to the buyer; a buyer who could have inspected but did not is in a weaker position.
Likely outcome: the AS-IS ticket generally controls, and "runs great" is probably opinion rather than an express warranty - but the auctioneer's own statement is the vulnerability, and a court could find the combination misleading. The safe practice is to avoid condition assurances the auctioneer cannot verify.
2. Separately assess the buyer's-premium and payment terms. Marla says she was rushed. What should the auctioneer have done to make those terms stick, and what happens to the $23,000 obligation now?
Read the worked answer
The 15% premium and same-day payment terms are enforceable if they were disclosed before bidding and the buyer had a real opportunity to see them. Best practice: post terms at registration, announce the premium and payment deadline before the lot opens, have the buyer register and acknowledge terms before receiving a bidder number, and give a moment to read the ticket before signing.
On the obligation: the hammer fell and Marla is the buyer. The as-is and payment terms, if properly disclosed, mean she owes $23,000 plus 15% ($3,450) = $26,450, and the $50/day storage begins after Friday. Her remedy is not to refuse payment; it is to pay and pursue any claim she believes she has over the condition statement.
If the auctioneer determines the "runs great" statement was misleading, the practical fix is a negotiated rescission or price adjustment rather than forcing a fight - but that is a business decision to protect the seller and the auction's reputation, not an admission that the ticket terms were invalid.