TX Plumber study materials
TX Plumber study resources

Inspector Reviewing a Rough-In With Multiple Defects

TX Plumber · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Inspector Reviewing a Rough-In With Multiple Defects

You are a Plumbing Inspector conducting a rough-in inspection on a new two-story single-family home. You observe: a 3-inch soil stack with a horizontal offset of about 4 feet between floors using two 90-degree fittings; a 2-inch vent that terminates in the attic about 4 feet below the roof deck; a water heater TPR valve discharging through a flexible tube into a floor drain with no air gap; and a gas water heater in a closet with a louvered door but no combustion air opening to the exterior. The installing journeyman says the previous inspector passed similar work on the same street and asks you to 'give it a pass' because drywall is scheduled tomorrow.

1. Identify the code concerns you would cite and whether you can approve the rough-in.

Read the worked answer

You cannot approve as-is. Concerns to cite (subject to the locally adopted code edition):

  1. Soil stack offset - a horizontal offset between floors using two 90-degree fittings is generally not permitted; offsets typically require appropriate fittings (e.g., wyes and 45s) and may require additional venting. Verify against the code's stack/offset provisions.
  2. Vent terminating in the attic - a vent must terminate outdoors above the roof, not in the attic. This is a clear defect.
  3. TPR discharge - must discharge through an air gap or approved receptor; a flexible tube into a floor drain without an air gap is improper. Verify material and termination.
  4. Combustion air - a gas water heater in a closet with only a louvered door may not have adequate combustion air; verify the code's combustion-air requirements and whether the louvered door provides sufficient free area or an exterior opening is required.

Prior approvals on other homes do not bind you; each inspection stands on its own. Issue a correction notice listing each item.

2. The installer cites a prior inspector's approval and the drywall schedule. How do you respond?

Read the worked answer

Respond professionally and firmly:

  • Prior approvals do not establish a code interpretation that binds you; if earlier work was passed in error, that does not make this work compliant.
  • The drywall schedule is not a basis to approve noncompliant work; covering defects makes correction harder and more expensive.
  • Provide a written correction notice with each item, the code basis, and a re-inspection path.
  • Offer to re-inspect promptly once corrections are made so the schedule can recover.

Document the conversation and the notice. Consistency and a written record protect the inspection program and give the contractor a clear path forward.

3. What must the contractor correct before you reinspect, and what will you check?

Read the worked answer

Required corrections:

  1. Rework the stack offset with approved fittings and verify any additional venting required.
  2. Extend the vent to terminate outdoors above the roof per code.
  3. Correct the TPR discharge to an approved air gap/receptor with proper material and slope.
  4. Provide code-compliant combustion air for the gas water heater (verify louvered door free area or add exterior combustion-air opening).

On reinspection, verify each item against the adopted code, confirm no new defects were introduced, and document pass/fail. Do not approve based on the contractor's assurance alone; visual verification of each correction is required.