Coinsurance, a Delayed Steel Order, and a 12% Fee
A fabrication shop burns. The commercial property form carries 80% coinsurance, a $1,200,000 building limit on a replacement cost of $2,000,000, and a $10,000 all-perils deductible. The adjuster's line-item estimate is $300,000 replacement cost, of which $60,000 is depreciation. Business income coverage is written at $40,000 per month with a 12-month limit. The insured's own estimator says rebuilding takes four months. The general contractor's critical-path schedule shows two months if structural steel is ordered in week one - but the owner spent six weeks re-bidding the job and ordered in week seven. The owner signed a public adjuster contract at 12% of "all insurance proceeds, including business income." The carrier's first written offer was $180,000.
1. Compute what the property damage pays under the coinsurance clause, and explain why the order of operations matters.
Read the worked answer
Step 1 - the coinsurance requirement. 0.80 × $2,000,000 = $1,600,000 required; $1,200,000 carried.
Step 2 - the ratio. $1,200,000 ÷ $1,600,000 = 0.75. The insured is a 75% coinsurer and bears 25% of the loss as a penalty.
Step 3 - apply to the loss. $300,000 × 0.75 = $225,000.
Step 4 - deductible. $225,000 − $10,000 = $215,000 payable.
Order of operations matters. Applying the deductible first gives ($300,000 − $10,000) × 0.75 = $217,500 - a $2,500 difference. The form applies the coinsurance proportion to the amount of loss and then deducts; confirm the exact policy language, and if the carrier used the less favorable order, raise it. Small on this file, decisive on a large one.
Against the offer. The carrier offered $180,000 against a computed $215,000 - a $35,000 gap on a single computation. That gap is entirely about valuation method, not about whether coverage exists, which is exactly where a public adjuster adds value. It also shows why the adjuster must re-derive the coinsurance math independently rather than accept the carrier's worksheet.
2. Defend or attack the business income claim. How many months are recoverable?
Read the worked answer
The rule. Business income runs for the period of restoration - the time it should take to repair or replace the property with reasonable speed and similar quality - not the time the insured happened to take. "Reasonable speed" is measured against what a prudent operator could have achieved, and delay the insured itself caused is excluded.
Application. The contractor's schedule proves two months was achievable. The six weeks spent re-bidding is not a delay caused by the loss; it is a business decision by the insured. So the recoverable period is approximately two months, not four.
Math. 2 × $40,000 = $80,000. The four-month theory would claim $160,000 and invite a denial of the whole income claim, including the legitimate part.
Nuance worth preserving. If the steel order was itself delayed by a supplier allocation caused by the fire, or by a permit office backlog, those weeks are recoverable - get the CPM schedule, purchase orders, and permit logs to separate carrier-caused from insured-caused delay. Also pursue extra expense (rental of temporary equipment, overtime, temporary location) as a separate line, and confirm whether the deductible has already been absorbed by the property payment so it is not deducted twice.
Contingent issue. Confirm whether the business income limit carries its own coinsurance or an agreed-value provision; if it does, the same proportional analysis must be run on that limit separately.
3. The public adjuster submits an invoice of 12% of $310,000. Evaluate the fee and state how it should be collected.
Read the worked answer
Rate. 12% exceeds the 10% statutory cap on the amount of the insurance claim settlement. The cap applies regardless of what the contract says and regardless of the quality of the result.
Base. The correct base is the settlement actually paid, not the carrier's first offer plus a hoped-for number. Assume $215,000 property plus $80,000 business income = $295,000; 10% = $29,500 maximum. The submitted invoice of 12% × $310,000 = $37,200 is over by $7,700 - and part of the base it was computed on is not recoverable at all.
Incremental question. The adjuster should be prepared to justify the fee against his actual contribution: the carrier offered $180,000 and the supported figure is roughly $295,000. Fee as a share of the increase is far higher than 10% of the total, but that argument is for persuading the client, not for exceeding the cap.
Collection mechanics. The fee comes from the insured out of proceeds actually received - never from a claim payment the adjuster does not control, and never before the funds clear. Where a mortgagee or a loss-payee is on the check, obtain written direction signed by all payees before deducting anything. Funds held for the insured belong in a trust account, uncommingled, and must be disbursed promptly with an itemized accounting.
Note for the file: confirm current TDI rule text on the cap and on any catastrophe-specific provision before issuing the corrected invoice.