The Final-Sale Drill and the Cracked Housing
Northwind Supplies publishes a two-tier return policy. Within 30 days of delivery, any item may be returned for a full refund, no reason required. Between 31 and 90 days, an item may be returned for store credit only, and only if it is unused and in its original packaging; opened items in that window are refused. Clearance items marked "final sale" are never returnable, including inside 30 days. Dana, a service rep, must reply to a customer who bought a clearance drill 12 days ago, opened it, and is demanding a refund because the housing arrived cracked. Dana's draft opens: "Because your item was marked final sale, we cannot accept a return; however, we can offer 15% off a replacement." The customer has sent a photo of the crack and a photo of the shipping box, which was crushed.
1. Is Dana's draft consistent with the written policy? Identify the one fact in the situation that the policy does not address.
Read the worked answer
Partly consistent, and it answers the wrong question.
- The final-sale rule does bar a refund based on change of mind, and it explicitly overrides the 30-day window ("including inside 30 days"). So the return request fails under the written policy.
- But the customer is not describing a return. The stated reason is that the housing arrived cracked - a transit-damage claim. The crushed-box photo supports that reading.
- The policy is silent on merchandise that arrives damaged or defective. That is the gap Dana's draft papers over.
- The 15% discount is a discretionary goodwill offer, not a policy entitlement, and leading with it signals the company has already decided against the customer before investigating the damage claim.
2. A colleague argues: "The 30-day window hasn't closed, so the customer is entitled to a full refund." Evaluate that argument.
Read the worked answer
The argument is invalid; it confuses a deadline with an eligibility rule.
- The 30-day window answers when a return may be made. The final-sale exclusion answers which items may be returned at all. The exclusion is a separate, overriding condition.
- Test it: the same argument would entitle a customer on day 29 to refund an unopened final-sale item, which the policy plainly forbids. An argument that proves too much is not a good argument.
- What survives is a different claim. If the unit was damaged in transit, the customer may be owed a remedy - but on damage grounds, not on the return-window grounds the colleague asserts.
3. Rewrite Dana's opening sentences so they are accurate, do not concede or deny liability prematurely, and give the customer a clear next step.
Read the worked answer
Sample rewrite:
Thank you for the photos - a housing cracked on arrival is not the condition we ship in, and I'm sorry this happened. Your drill was sold as a final-sale clearance item, so our standard return policy does not apply to it; that does not settle what happened in transit, though. I have opened a damage claim with the carrier and will confirm within two business days whether we replace the unit or refund you in full. Please keep the carton and packing material until the claim closes.
Why this works: it states the final-sale rule accurately without using it to end the conversation, avoids admitting fault the company has not yet established, and replaces the vague 15% offer with a dated commitment. If the policy gap recurs, the fix is at the policy level - add an express damaged-on-arrival clause - not in the next rep's draft.