The Washing Machine Loss: What the HO-3 Actually Pays
A Gillette couple owns an HO-3 with Coverage A $420,000, Coverage B $42,000, Coverage C $210,000, Coverage D $126,000, a $2,500 all-perils deductible, and replacement cost settlement on the dwelling and contents. There is no water backup or sump overflow endorsement. While they are away for a long weekend, a braided supply hose on the second-floor washing machine bursts and water runs for roughly 40 hours. Damage: hardwood flooring $18,000; drywall, subfloor and cabinets $9,000; mold remediation $14,000; ruined contents $6,000. The house is uninhabitable for six weeks during repairs; comparable rent is $2,200 per month. The couple also wants the floors replaced with a premium wide-plank product costing $11,000 more than the original grade.
1. Determine whether the loss is covered, identify the exclusions that must be checked, and explain why the absence of the water backup endorsement does not defeat the claim.
Read the worked answer
Covered. The HO-3 covers accidental discharge or overflow of water or steam from a plumbing system, appliance, or HVAC system. A burst supply hose is the classic example - this is a sudden and accidental event, not a maintenance failure.
Exclusions to test (each is a near-miss that exam questions turn on):
- Constant or repeated seepage/leakage over 14 days - no; the hose failed once, 40 hours of water escape.
- Freezing of a plumbing system while the dwelling is vacant/unoccupied - not applicable; no freeze occurred.
- Water backup from a sewer or drain, or sump overflow - the backup endorsement is irrelevant here because the water came from a supply line, not from a drain or sump. This is the pivotal distinction: lack of the endorsement does not bar the claim.
- Mold, fungus, wet rot - not excluded outright, but sublimited (see next task).
- Vacancy - the standard unoccupancy condition (typically 60 consecutive days) is not triggered by a long weekend.
- Faulty workmanship/negligent maintenance - the old hose is wear-and-tear-adjacent, but the resulting water damage is still accidental.
Also confirm the post-loss duties: notify promptly, protect the property from further damage (water extraction, drying), and preserve the damaged hose as evidence.
2. Calculate the total Section I payment, applying the mold sublimit and the deductible correctly, and compute the additional living expense payment.
Read the worked answer
Direct damage to the dwelling (Coverages A/B): $18,000 flooring + $9,000 drywall/subfloor/cabinets = $27,000.
Mold remediation: the HO-3 caps mold at a sublimit (commonly $10,000 aggregate per policy period) regardless of the Coverage A limit. $14,000 incurred → $10,000 payable; $4,000 is the insured's cost.
Contents (Coverage C): $6,000, replacement cost, within the $210,000 limit.
Additional living expense (Coverage D): the premises are uninhabitable, so ALE applies on an incurred, 24/7 basis. $2,200/month ÷ 30 = $73.33/day × 42 days ≈ $3,080, within the $126,000 limit. (Rounded monthly: 6 weeks × $2,200 × 12/52 ≈ $3,046.)
Total before deductible: 27,000 + 10,000 + 6,000 + 3,080 = $46,080.
Deductible: the $2,500 applies once per occurrence to the Section I property loss (Coverage D typically shares the single deductible; some forms exclude ALE - verify the form).
Net payable ≈ $43,580.
Watch-outs: do not apply the deductible to the mold sublimit separately; do not let the $10,000 mold cap reduce the underlying water-damage payment; and confirm whether the insured's policy settles contents at replacement cost only after replacement is completed (many forms pay ACV first and hold back recoverable depreciation).
3. The insured demands the premium wide-plank flooring at the insurer's expense and asks whether he should skip the drying company to save on the claim. Address both.
Read the worked answer
On the upgrade: replacement cost settlement means repair or replace with material of like kind and quality - functionally equivalent flooring, not a betterment. The insurer owes the cost to replace with comparable grade. The $11,000 difference is the insured's out-of-pocket betterment. Two nuances:
- If the premium product is now the only code-compliant or commonly available match, argue it - but expect the carrier to price it as an upgrade.
- Replacement cost is paid in two stages: actual cash value first, recoverable depreciation released after repair or replacement is complete and documented. Owners frequently mistake the holdback for underpayment.
On skipping mitigation: bad advice, and potentially costly. The policy imposes a duty to protect covered property from further damage after a loss, and reasonable costs to do so are covered as part of the loss. Water sitting in a wall cavity for days converts a $27,000 repair into a structural and mold problem that runs into the mold sublimit - where the insured eats the overage. Professional drying is generally reimbursable and preserves the claim.
Also remind him:
- Do not make permanent repairs before the adjuster inspects; emergency mitigation is fine.
- Keep receipts for drying, temp housing, and meals above normal living costs (ALE covers increased costs, not the normal baseline).
- The $2,500 deductible applies regardless, so
saving the claimby skipping mitigation saves nothing and risks a denial for failure to mitigate.