Reading a ward census: who left, who stayed, and what to do
Ward 12 counted 8 400 people in the 2022 census, down from 9 600 in 2012. Of those who left, 62% were aged 15–34 and 70% were male. The primary school has 40 fewer pupils than in 2019, and one of its six teachers has been redeployed to another ward. About half the remaining households say they receive money from relatives in South Africa or Harare. The clinic reports more teenage births and fewer men attending antenatal visits. The councillor proposes spending the ward's development fund on a football pitch 'to keep the young men at home'.
1. Describe the type of migration taking place in Ward 12 and explain what the age and sex figures tell you.
Read the worked answer
Step 1 – Look at the numbers, not the story. Population fell from 9 600 to 8 400 - a loss of 1 200 people, or 12.5% in ten years.
Step 2 – Read the age structure. 62% of leavers were 15–34. This is age-selective migration: it is not whole families moving, but young adults in the years when people start work, marry and have children. A ward that loses this group loses its future workforce and its future parents.
Step 3 – Read the sex structure. 70% were male. This is sex-selective labour migration, the classic pattern of young men leaving for mines, farms and cities, leaving behind more women, children and elderly people.
Step 4 – Name the type. It is out-migration from a rural ward, mostly to urban centres and across the border - voluntary, economically driven, and partly circular, since 50% of households receive money back.
Conclusion: Ward 12 is not simply shrinking; it is being reshaped. It is losing exactly the group that would otherwise be its farmers, taxpayers and parents.
2. Explain three likely effects of this migration on the ward, using the school, the clinic and the households as evidence.
Read the worked answer
Effect 1 – Fewer children, so services shrink. The primary school has 40 fewer pupils and has lost a teacher. Falling rolls mean fixed costs are spread over fewer learners, and redeploying teachers is hard to reverse: once a school loses staff, rebuilding the roll does not bring them straight back.
Effect 2 – A changing dependency burden. With young adults away, the ratio of dependants (children, the elderly, the sick) to working-age adults rises. Those left behind must farm more land with less labour, which often means less land is cultivated and food security weakens.
Effect 3 – Remittances and new pressures on the clinic. Half of households receiving money from South Africa or Harare shows migration is not only a loss - it is an income stream that keeps households going. But the clinic's reports point to a social cost: more teenage births and fewer men at antenatal visits suggest family structures are strained and young people are left without close supervision or support.
Reasoning note: the effects are not all negative. A good answer weighs the cash inflow from remittances against the loss of labour and the social strain - and notices that the census and the clinic are describing the same ward, so the evidence must fit together.
3. Evaluate the councillor's football pitch proposal. What would you recommend instead, and why?
Read the worked answer
Step 1 – Test the proposal against the evidence. The pitch assumes young men leave because there is nothing to do. But the census points to work as the pull factor, and half of households already depend on money earned outside the ward. A pitch does not create a single job and will not stop a young man who is supporting a family.
Step 2 – Note what the pitch would not fix. The school is losing pupils and a teacher; the clinic is reporting teenage births. A pitch touches neither problem directly, unless it is tied to a youth programme with coaching and health information.
Step 3 – Judge fairly. The proposal is not worthless - recreation and organised sport do give young people a social anchor and a reason to stay engaged - but it is being asked to solve an economic problem it cannot solve.
Recommendation - spend the fund on three things instead:
- Water for irrigation or a market garden run by young adults, which creates income in the ward and makes farming viable for the 25–34 group.
- A creche or youth-friendly clinic service, which addresses the teenage-birth evidence and lets young mothers finish school.
- A small skills or tool-lending scheme (welding, sewing, carpentry, poultry) with a written repayment plan, so the fund circulates instead of being spent once.
Compromise: if the community strongly wants a pitch, fund it last and partly, with a youth committee managing bookings, so the ward gets recreation without sacrificing the economic investment. Give reasons in terms of the evidence, not preference.