The Missing Beneficiary Designation
A participant, age 47, dies unexpectedly. His 401(k) balance is $240,000. He was divorced two years ago; the divorce decree required him to remove his ex-spouse as beneficiary, but HR has no record of an updated designation on file. The only beneficiary form in the file, signed nine years ago, names the ex-spouse as 100% beneficiary. The participant's current partner of three years and his adult daughter from the prior marriage both contact the plan administrator. The partner says the participant 'told everyone' he wanted her to get the money and produces text messages to that effect. The daughter says the ex-spouse should get nothing. The plan document says benefits are paid to the beneficiary designated on the most recent valid form, and if none, in a default order: spouse, then children, then estate.
1. Advise the plan administrator on how to determine the beneficiary, addressing the old form, the divorce decree, and the text messages.
Read the worked answer
The administrator must follow the plan document and the last valid designation on file. The nine-year-old form naming the ex-spouse is the most recent valid designation unless it was superseded. The divorce decree is a court order between the participant and his ex-spouse; it does not automatically amend a plan beneficiary designation unless the plan document incorporates such orders or the order is a qualified domestic relations order directing the plan. A general 'remove the ex-spouse' clause in a divorce decree typically does not bind the plan.
On the evidence:
- Text messages are not a valid beneficiary designation under a plan that requires a signed, filed form. They are hearsay as to intent and do not override the written designation.
- The ex-spouse remains the designated beneficiary unless (a) the plan document provides that divorce automatically revokes a designation, or (b) a court determines otherwise and the plan is joined.
Practical steps: obtain the divorce decree and any QDRO, confirm whether the plan document has an automatic-revocation-on-divorce provision, and follow the document. If the plan pays the ex-spouse, notify the other claimants in writing of the determination and their appeal rights under ERISA claims procedures. Do not accept the partner's oral/text evidence as a designation.
2. The partner threatens to sue. Describe the communication and documentation steps the administrator should take.
Read the worked answer
- Written determination. Issue a written benefit determination to each claimant explaining the basis: the last valid designation on file, the plan's default order, and why texts/decree do not control. Include ERISA claims-procedure language and appeal deadlines.
- Document everything. Log the date the death was reported, the forms reviewed, the decree obtained, and each communication. Keep copies of the old designation and the plan's beneficiary provisions.
- Do not pay prematurely. Consider holding the balance briefly if a court proceeding is filed, but follow the plan's timeline and the document's terms - a plan that pays the designated beneficiary in good faith is generally protected.
- Escalate to counsel if litigation is threatened, and consider interpleader if there is a genuine dispute over entitlement.
- Fix the process going forward. The root cause is a stale designation. Recommend an annual beneficiary-review campaign and a process to flag divorce-related updates.