The Bakery Expansion Decision
Harlow & Sons is a family bakery operating from a single high-street shop. It has traded profitably for 12 years with annual revenue of £420,000 and a net margin of 6%. The owner, Priya, wants to open a second shop in a nearby town. The new site requires £85,000 of fit-out costs, a £30,000 annual rent, and two additional staff at £22,000 each. Market research suggests the second shop would generate £350,000 in year-one revenue at a similar margin. Priya has £40,000 in retained profits and could borrow the remainder at 8% interest. Meanwhile, a national supermarket chain has just announced plans to open a bakery counter in the same nearby town, and local footfall data shows the town centre has seen a 9% decline in shoppers over two years.
1. Identify the key external environmental factors affecting Priya's decision, and explain how each one might change the viability of the second shop.
Read the worked answer
The decision is shaped by several external environmental factors rather than internal capability alone.
Competitive pressure: The supermarket chain's bakery counter represents a new entrant with scale advantages (bulk buying, brand recognition, loss-leader pricing). It could suppress the achievable margin at the new shop below the assumed 6%, so the £21,000 projected profit (6% of £350,000) may not materialise.
Economic/market trends: The 9% decline in town-centre footfall is a demand-side signal. A revenue projection made without adjusting for falling footfall is likely optimistic; Priya should stress-test the numbers against a lower footfall scenario.
Financial environment: The 8% borrowing cost on £75,000 (the shortfall after £40,000 retained profits and £85,000 fit-out) adds roughly £6,000 annual interest, which must be covered before the shop contributes profit.
The judgement: external signals (declining footfall plus a well-resourced competitor) point toward deferring or downsizing the plan, not simply proceeding on the headline projection.
2. Using the figures given, assess whether the second shop is likely to be financially viable in year one, and state what additional information you would want before advising Priya.
Read the worked answer
Rough year-one viability check:
- Projected revenue: £350,000 at 6% margin = £21,000 net profit.
- Fixed costs to cover: rent £30,000 + two staff at £22,000 (£44,000) = £74,000, plus interest on borrowing.
- Borrowing: £85,000 fit-out − £40,000 retained = £45,000 borrowed at 8% ≈ £3,600 interest.
On the surface £21,000 profit exceeds £74,000 of rent and wages only if the margin is calculated after those costs. If the 6% margin is the same net margin as the existing shop, it already absorbs rent and wages, leaving £21,000 - but that £21,000 must also cover £3,600 interest, leaving about £17,400. That is thin given the competitor and footfall risks.
Additional information needed: whether the 6% margin is gross or net; the payback period on the £85,000 fit-out; break-even revenue; the lease term and exit costs; and a downside scenario assuming 9% lower footfall. The judgement is that viability is marginal and highly sensitive to the external risks identified.