The Volunteer Who Crossed a Line
A community health nonprofit relies on 85 volunteers. A long-serving volunteer, 'Pat,' has been coordinating the food pantry for 5 years and is well-liked. A new staff member reports that Pat made repeated inappropriate comments to a client and once gave a client a ride home without following the organization's transportation policy. The staff member is afraid to file a formal complaint because Pat is close to the ED. The ED is on vacation. The HR manager has documentation of the policy violation but not the comments. The organization has a written volunteer handbook that includes a code of conduct and a zero-tolerance harassment policy. The client has not complained. The board chair asks the HR manager to 'handle it quietly' to avoid upsetting donors.
1. What should the HR manager do first, and what are the ethical and legal considerations?
Read the worked answer
First, the HR manager must document the report and initiate a formal investigation per the volunteer handbook. The report of inappropriate comments triggers the harassment policy, regardless of whether the client complained. The HR manager should not promise confidentiality but should protect the reporter from retaliation. The board chair's request to 'handle it quietly' conflicts with the organization's zero-tolerance policy and could expose the nonprofit to liability if the behavior continues. Ethically, the organization owes a duty of care to clients and volunteers. Legally, failure to act on a harassment report could create a hostile environment claim. The HR manager should inform the board chair that a formal process is required and that the ED will be briefed upon return. The investigation should include interviews with the staff member, Pat, and any witnesses, and a review of the transportation policy.
2. How should the organization handle Pat during the investigation, and what should be communicated to the board chair?
Read the worked answer
Pat should be temporarily reassigned away from direct client contact pending the investigation, with pay if Pat is a stipended volunteer, or with a clear explanation that this is not disciplinary. The HR manager should communicate to the board chair that the organization's policies and legal obligations require a documented process, and that a quiet resolution would not be defensible if the behavior recurs or if the staff member faces retaliation. The board chair should be reminded of the organization's whistleblower and anti-retaliation policies. The HR manager should also ensure the client's safety and offer support services. After the investigation, the organization should take appropriate action based on findings, which may include additional training, a written warning, or dismissal, and should document all steps.