The Basement Staircase and a Changing Account
A 67-year-old man is found dead at the base of his basement staircase. His wife says she heard a thud at 22:30 and found him at 23:00. He is supine with his feet toward the stairs. There is a 5 cm laceration of the right occiput, a 3 x 4 cm purple contusion on the left upper arm, and, on examination, a fresh fracture of the left sixth rib. Blood alcohol is 0.21 g/dL. The staircase has eight steps, a 7 mm metal nosing on each, a handrail on the right side only, and a 1.7 m ceiling at the bottom landing. Her account changes once: first "he fell from the top," later "he stumbled on the third step."
1. What scene measurements and observations do you need to test a fall hypothesis?
Read the worked answer
Capture the geometry, because a fall reconstruction depends on it:
- Riser height and tread depth for each of the eight steps, plus total rise and run. Note the 7 mm metal nosing - a hard, narrow edge is a plausible impact surface for an occipital laceration.
- Handrail condition and continuity (right side only): does it run the full flight, is it secure, where does it end at the bottom?
- The 1.7 m ceiling at the landing - a person descending or falling near the bottom could strike his head on it. Measure it and note head clearance.
- Blood distribution: where is blood on the steps, the nosing, the floor, the wall, the handrail? Blood on a tread tells you where the bleeding started; blood only at the base tells you the head injury happened there.
- Footwear, lighting, floor surface, and the position of the body relative to the last step.
- Clothing and any transferred material (rust, dust, grease) consistent with a specific step.
Photograph and diagram with measurements. Do not accept either version of her account as the working model.
2. How do you interpret the injuries, and what can and cannot be concluded without autopsy?
Read the worked answer
Occipital laceration: plausible from a backward fall, and the 7 mm metal nosing is a candidate impact surface. But a laceration on the back of the head is not diagnostic of a fall - it is diagnostic of blunt impact. Location alone doesn't distinguish a stair edge from a blunt instrument.
Contusion of the left upper arm: think about mechanism before labeling it "defensive." Arm contusions in falls are common (grasping the handrail, striking the wall). A pattern-shaped contusion, or one on the inner upper arm in a grip pattern, would raise a different question. Document size, shape, color, and any patterned features with scale photographs.
Left sixth rib fracture: timing and location matter. Posterior/lateral rib fractures in an older adult can result from the fall itself, from CPR, or from something else. Without autopsy you cannot say whether the fracture is fresh, whether it is associated with underlying pulmonary injury, or whether there are other fractures.
Blood alcohol 0.21: supports impaired gait and a fall, but also complicates the history and affects how the wife's timeline should be weighed.
Bottom line: the findings are compatible with a fall; compatibility is not the same as proof. The single most important next step is a full autopsy with toxicology.
3. The wife's account changed. What is your investigative response?
Read the worked answer
An altered account is a reason to gather more information, not a reason to announce suspicion.
- Record both versions verbatim with times and who was present. The change itself - "fell from the top" to "stumbled on the third step" - is a documented fact and belongs in the report.
- Reconstruct against the scene. If he fell from the top of eight steps, the injury pattern, blood trail, and final body position will differ from a stumble on step three. Use your measurements to characterize both.
- Re-interview separately and later, away from the house, allowing her to correct or explain the discrepancy. Sudden-death witnesses commonly revise accounts as they reconstruct the event; a revision is not a lie.
- Obtain medical history - anticoagulation, prior falls, neuropathy, alcohol history.
- Ask about the interval. She heard a thud at 22:30 and found him at 23:00; what happened in those 30 minutes is a legitimate question.
- Consider scene preservation and the manner line. Do not finalize manner before autopsy. If the autopsy produces findings inconsistent with a simple fall, the case goes to the investigators with your report, and you do not confront the family yourself.