ABMDI Board (F-ABMDI) study plan
ABMDI Board (F-ABMDI) · Give each week a clear focus.
8 weeks · About 6 hours per week
Scene Investigation and Scene Documentation
Build a one-page checklist that sequences the arrive-approach-assess actions at a death scene from first contact to release of the body
Diagram the boundary-setting logic for a scene, distinguishing the inner perimeter, outer perimeter, and the point where scene control transfers to another authority
List the categories of physical evidence an investigator documents at a scene and write one sentence per category explaining why it matters to the death investigation
Practice writing a scene narrative that describes conditions in objective, observation-only language with no conclusions
Identify the documentation mistakes that weaken a scene record and write a corrective rule for each
Your checkpoint
A two-page scene documentation packet: perimeter diagram template, evidence category table, and one fully written 300-word objective scene narrative from a self-created hypothetical
Death Circumstances, Injury Interpretation, and Follow-Up Investigation
Differentiate the major injury mechanisms (blunt, sharp, firearm, thermal, asphyxial, chemical) and write the pattern each leaves on the body
Map the common manner-of-death categories to the injury and circumstance patterns that most often support each classification
Sequence the follow-up steps an investigator takes after an equivocal scene: records request, witness canvass, medical history retrieval, and re-interview
Explain postmortem change timelines (livor, rigor, algor, decomposition) and state how each influences time-of-death estimates
Construct five short case vignettes with mixed findings and reason to the most defensible manner classification, recording the reasoning steps
Your checkpoint
An injury-and-manner reference table covering at least eight finding patterns, plus a written reasoning log for each of the five vignettes
Scene Investigation and Scene Documentation & Death Circumstances, Injury Interpretation, and Follow-Up Investigation
Integrate scene findings with autopsy and toxicology results by writing a reconciliation memo that flags contradictions between scene and body findings
Reconstruct three timelines from artificial fact patterns, each combining scene observations, witness statements, and postmortem indicators
Distinguish accidental, suicidal, and homicidal firearm patterns using wound location, trajectory, and scene context, and document the reasoning for each
Identify which follow-up questions an investigator must answer before releasing a scene for which the manner is unresolved
Your checkpoint
A combined case-reconciliation worksheet applied to three self-written scenarios, each with a scene summary, injury summary, and a stated provisional manner with supporting reasoning
Decedent Examination, Identification, and Property
Outline the sequence of the external decedent examination from initial observation through final documentation
Compare identification methods (visual, fingerprint, dental, DNA, radiologic) and state the reliability limits of each
Draft the process for inventorying, documenting, and releasing personal property and evidence taken from a decedent
Describe the chain-of-custody requirements that apply to property from the moment it is removed from the body to final disposition
Recognize the findings on external examination that must be reported to the pathologist rather than recorded and left unaddressed
Your checkpoint
A property inventory and chain-of-custody form template plus a one-page identification-method comparison chart with reliability limits
Medicolegal Death Investigation Systems, Jurisdiction, and Legal Authority
Distinguish the roles and legal authority of the coroner, medical examiner, and justice of the peace systems as they apply in different jurisdictions
State the legal thresholds that trigger a death investigation, including reportable-death criteria and who holds the reporting duty
Explain the jurisdiction questions an investigator must resolve at the outset: geographic authority, concurrent jurisdiction, and referral to another agency
Identify the investigator's authority at a scene regarding access, control, and release, and the limits on that authority
Diagram the flow of legal authority from death notification through certification and final disposition
Your checkpoint
A one-page jurisdictional authority flowchart plus a written list of at least ten reportable-death triggers with the reporting duty holder for each
Reporting, Death Certification, Ethics, and Professional Practice
Draft a death certificate entry for each manner category, matching the cause-of-death statement to the manner field and avoiding common wording errors
Apply the ethical duties of the investigator to three artificial conflict scenarios, including confidentiality, conflicts of interest, and testimony boundaries
Write the components of a complete investigative report: chronology, findings, sources, and conclusions, kept separate from opinion
Prepare a mock testimony outline covering the questions an investigator is most often asked on the stand
Differentiate facts, observations, inferences, and opinions in a sample report and rewrite each statement into its proper category
Your checkpoint
A complete model investigative report for a self-created case, including a properly worded cause-of-death statement and an attached ethics self-check
Medicolegal Death Investigation Systems, Jurisdiction, and Legal Authority & Scene Investigation and Scene Documentation & Decedent Examination, Identification, and Property & Death Circumstances, Injury Interpretation, and Follow-Up Investigation & Reporting, Death Certification, Ethics, and Professional Practice
Re-audit every prior deliverable against the domain objectives and list the specific gaps found
Re-drill the three weakest topic areas identified in the audit with at least 40 targeted recall questions per area
Rebuild the two weakest templates or reference tables so each entry carries a stated rationale rather than a label
Time yourself through a mixed-domain question set and analyze every miss by domain and error type
Your checkpoint
A gap analysis document listing every weak objective, the corrective action taken, and a re-test score for each area, plus a revised version of the two weakest documents
Medicolegal Death Investigation Systems, Jurisdiction, and Legal Authority & Scene Investigation and Scene Documentation & Decedent Examination, Identification, and Property & Death Circumstances, Injury Interpretation, and Follow-Up Investigation & Reporting, Death Certification, Ethics, and Professional Practice
Complete two full-length timed practice exams and record scores by domain
Review every missed item and write a one-sentence rule that would have prevented the error
Recite from memory the scene protocol, identification method limits, reportable-death triggers, and cause-of-death wording rules
Confirm readiness by re-checking each domain against the milestone targets and scheduling the exam
Your checkpoint
A final scorecard showing both practice exam scores by domain, a written error-rule list, and a signed readiness statement naming any domain still below target
Milestones
Week 2: Can state without notes the scene protocol sequence, at least six evidence categories, and the injury patterns tied to each manner category; self-quiz score of 75% or higher on Domains 2 and 4
Week 4: Can produce a complete property chain-of-custody record and justify the choice of identification method for three different decedent conditions; self-quiz score of 75% or higher on Domain 3
Week 6: Can write a defensible cause-of-death statement and manner for five different scenarios and identify the ethical issue in each; self-quiz score of 75% or higher on Domains 1 and 5
Week 8: Two full-length timed practice exams completed with all five domains at or above 75% and no domain below 70%; error-rule list written and reviewed