Divorced Parents, a Subpoena, and an Adolescent's Confidences
Dr. R is a psychologist in private practice. Jordan, age 15, has been in weekly therapy for four months for anxiety. The parents divorced two years ago and share joint legal custody. Jordan's father emails demanding the complete record, including psychotherapy notes, and says he will subpoena it. The mother calls him "controlling" and asks Dr. R not to release anything. In session, Jordan discloses weekly cannabis vaping and a sexual relationship with a 16-year-old, and asks Dr. R not to tell either parent. Jordan's grades have dropped this term. There is no indication of abuse, coercion, or suicidality. Dr. R's state permits minors aged 15 to consent to outpatient psychotherapy, but this practice has historically involved parents in treatment.
1. How should Dr. R respond to the father's request and threatened subpoena?
Read the worked answer
Dr. R should separate the request into its two legal categories. Psychotherapy notes are held to a higher standard than the rest of the record and generally require a specific authorization that identifies them, even from a parent with custody; a general records request does not suffice. The remainder of the record may be accessible to a parent with joint legal custody unless a court order restricts that right, so Dr. R needs the custody decree, not just the parents' accounts. A subpoena is not self-executing permission to disclose; Dr. R should verify it with counsel, notify the mother as the other legal custodian, and seek a court ruling or protective order if the parents' positions conflict. Dr. R should not release anything while the custody terms are unclear, should document all contacts and the rationale for delay, and should tell the father in writing what is needed and why. Consultation with an attorney and, if warranted, an ethics consultation is the prudent course before any release.
2. How should Dr. R handle the cannabis use and sexual relationship disclosures?
Read the worked answer
The first task is a focused risk assessment: frequency and context of cannabis use, impairment, driving, school decline, coercion or power imbalance in the sexual relationship, and any exploitation. Absent abuse, coercion, or imminent danger, there is no clear mandatory-reporting trigger, but Dr. R must verify the state's age-of-consent and minor-consent statutes, because a 16-year-old partner may or may not fall within a protected peer range. Confidentiality for a 15-year-old who can consent to psychotherapy should be honored as the default to preserve the alliance, while Dr. R works with Jordan on disclosure. I would use motivational interviewing for cannabis, connect the grade decline to Jordan's own goals, and rehearse how Jordan might tell a parent. I would be transparent about the limits of confidentiality and about what would compel disclosure. Pushing immediate parental notification over Jordan's objection risks losing the adolescent and the safety information-the very outcome confidentiality protects.