ABPP Clinical Child & Adolescent study plan
ABPP Clinical Child & Adolescent · Give each week a clear focus.
8 weeks · About 7 hours per week
Assessment, diagnosis, and psychological/psychoeducational testing & Developmental psychopathology and normative development
Construct a one-page differential decision tree for the five most common childhood anxiety presentations, writing DSM-5-TR criteria from memory before checking them.
Administer and hand-score two full cognitive batteries under timed conditions using practice materials you own, then compare obtained index scores against manual norms.
Chart normative motor, language, social-cognitive, and self-regulation milestones from birth to 12 years onto a single annotated timeline.
Calculate sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value for one screening instrument at three different base rates, and state in writing how prevalence shifts interpretation.
Summarize parent- and teacher-report behavior rating systems, listing which scales pair with which referral questions.
Your checkpoint
A 12-page annotated assessment-and-development binder section containing the decision tree, two scored protocols with norm comparisons, the milestone timeline, and a 40-item self-quiz you write and score at 85% or better.
Assessment, diagnosis, and psychological/psychoeducational testing & Evidence-based intervention and treatment planning
Draft an intake-to-diagnosis workflow that names the top three rule-outs for each of four referral types and the data source that discriminates each one.
Match six diagnoses to specific evidence-based protocols, citing the trial or guideline supporting each match.
Rehearse three structured diagnostic interviews aloud, timing each and noting where you skipped necessary coverage.
Select progress-monitoring measures for each protocol and define the cutoff for nonresponse at week 6.
Write a treatment-plan template that links target behavior, measurable goal, intervention component, and review date.
Your checkpoint
Two complete de-identified case conceptualizations, one externalizing and one internalizing, each at least 800 words with differential, selected protocol, fidelity checks, and progress measures.
Evidence-based intervention and treatment planning & Developmental psychopathology and normative development
Outline a 12-session cognitive-behavioral protocol for child anxiety, specifying parent components and between-session tasks for each session.
Sequence a behavioral parent-training curriculum across 10 sessions, naming the reinforcement and consequence procedures introduced in each.
Differentiate how the same protocol content is adapted for preschool, school-age, and adolescent clients, listing three concrete modifications per age band.
Identify contraindications and required adaptations for comorbid trauma, intellectual disability, and family instability.
Build a session-rating fidelity checklist and score your own outline against it.
Your checkpoint
A 12-session treatment manual outline plus a one-page developmental adaptation matrix, self-scored against a fidelity checklist with every item rated and gaps listed.
Developmental psychopathology and normative development & Evidence-based intervention and treatment planning
Contrast onset, course, and comorbidity patterns for ADHD, autism spectrum, trauma-related, and disruptive behavior presentations in a comparison table.
Write five original vignettes in which the correct diagnosis hinges on developmental timing or informant discrepancy, and supply answers with rationale.
Describe how intervention targets shift when a disruptive behavior presentation co-occurs with language delay or learning disorder.
Identify 10 evidence-based outcome measures and state the population and age range for each.
Your checkpoint
A set of 10 original vignettes with answer keys and rationales, plus a timed 60-item mixed practice block scored at 80% or above with every error logged by domain.
Consultation and interprofessional collaboration (family, school, medical, and community systems) & Ethics, legal and professional issues, and cultural responsiveness
Script a school-based feedback conference, including an opening framing statement, three data points to convey, and a response to a disagreeing parent.
Map consent, assent, and confidentiality limits for minors across therapy, assessment, and school settings, citing the relevant standard for each.
Formulate decision rules for record release, custody disputes, and mandated reporting, including who holds privilege in each situation.
Plan culturally responsive adaptations to assessment, covering measure selection, norm appropriateness, language, and interpreter use.
Practice two consultation calls with a physician and a teacher, noting how the recommendation differs by audience.
Your checkpoint
A consultation toolkit containing one phone script, one feedback-meeting agenda, and one ethics decision flowchart applied to eight written scenarios, each with a cited standard and a stated action.
Ethics, legal and professional issues, and cultural responsiveness & Scientific foundations, research methods, and outcome evaluation
Critique three published intervention studies, stating design, comparison condition, effect size, and threat to validity for each.
Compute and interpret number needed to treat, reliable change index, and clinically significant change from a supplied pre-post dataset.
Evaluate the internal and external validity of single-case designs commonly used in child treatment research.
Apply ethics standards to assent, incentive, and confidentiality issues in child research participation.
Draft an outcome-evaluation plan naming indicators, measurement schedule, and a decision rule for program continuation.
Your checkpoint
A 10-item statistics and appraisal worksheet with fully worked calculations and interpretations, plus an ethics case log of six dilemmas, each tagged to a standard and resolved in writing.
Supervision, teaching, and professional/leadership development & Scientific foundations, research methods, and outcome evaluation
Construct a supervision contract that specifies goals, session structure, documentation, and evaluation criteria.
Build a 10-item competency rubric spanning assessment, intervention, ethics, and cultural responsiveness, with behavioral anchors at three levels.
Record and self-rate two feedback dialogues against the rubric, then revise the weaker one.
Design a program-evaluation logic model linking inputs, activities, outputs, and child outcomes for one service.
Write a one-hour didactic outline on developmental psychopathology with learning objectives and an assessment question set.
Your checkpoint
A supervision and teaching packet containing the signed-format contract, the anchored 10-item rubric, the revised feedback dialogue, a one-hour didactic outline, and a completed logic model.
Assessment, diagnosis, and psychological/psychoeducational testing & Evidence-based intervention and treatment planning
Complete two full-length timed mock exams under exam-day conditions, scoring and logging every miss by domain and error type.
Re-teach your three weakest content areas by writing a one-page summary of each from memory, then verifying against sources.
Consolidate all prior deliverables into a single index with cross-references to each of the seven domains.
Rehearse a rapid-fire ethics and consultation drill of 25 items, targeting 90% accuracy.
Specify a maintenance plan for the two weeks before the exam, including review cadence and rest days.
Your checkpoint
A final error-analysis report with a domain-by-domain accuracy table showing every domain at 75% or above, plus a one-page exam-day checklist and the consolidated deliverable index.
Milestones
Week 2: Both case conceptualizations are complete and each diagnosis is defensible against at least two documented rule-outs.
Week 4: Mixed practice block scored at 80% or above, and the milestone timeline plus treatment outline are fully cross-referenced.
Week 6: All calculated statistics reproduce correctly, and each of the six ethics dilemmas cites a specific standard rather than a general principle.
Week 8: Both mock exams complete, domain accuracy table shows no domain below 75%, and every missed item has a written corrective note.