ABPP Clinical Child & Adolescent study materials
ABPP Clinical Child & Adolescent study resources

ABPP Clinical Child & Adolescent study plan

ABPP Clinical Child & Adolescent · Give each week a clear focus.

8 weeks · About 7 hours per week

Week 1

Assessment, diagnosis, and psychological/psychoeducational testing & Developmental psychopathology and normative development

  • Construct a one-page differential decision tree for the five most common childhood anxiety presentations, writing DSM-5-TR criteria from memory before checking them.

  • Administer and hand-score two full cognitive batteries under timed conditions using practice materials you own, then compare obtained index scores against manual norms.

  • Chart normative motor, language, social-cognitive, and self-regulation milestones from birth to 12 years onto a single annotated timeline.

  • Calculate sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value for one screening instrument at three different base rates, and state in writing how prevalence shifts interpretation.

  • Summarize parent- and teacher-report behavior rating systems, listing which scales pair with which referral questions.

Your checkpoint

A 12-page annotated assessment-and-development binder section containing the decision tree, two scored protocols with norm comparisons, the milestone timeline, and a 40-item self-quiz you write and score at 85% or better.

Week 2

Assessment, diagnosis, and psychological/psychoeducational testing & Evidence-based intervention and treatment planning

  • Draft an intake-to-diagnosis workflow that names the top three rule-outs for each of four referral types and the data source that discriminates each one.

  • Match six diagnoses to specific evidence-based protocols, citing the trial or guideline supporting each match.

  • Rehearse three structured diagnostic interviews aloud, timing each and noting where you skipped necessary coverage.

  • Select progress-monitoring measures for each protocol and define the cutoff for nonresponse at week 6.

  • Write a treatment-plan template that links target behavior, measurable goal, intervention component, and review date.

Your checkpoint

Two complete de-identified case conceptualizations, one externalizing and one internalizing, each at least 800 words with differential, selected protocol, fidelity checks, and progress measures.

Week 3

Evidence-based intervention and treatment planning & Developmental psychopathology and normative development

  • Outline a 12-session cognitive-behavioral protocol for child anxiety, specifying parent components and between-session tasks for each session.

  • Sequence a behavioral parent-training curriculum across 10 sessions, naming the reinforcement and consequence procedures introduced in each.

  • Differentiate how the same protocol content is adapted for preschool, school-age, and adolescent clients, listing three concrete modifications per age band.

  • Identify contraindications and required adaptations for comorbid trauma, intellectual disability, and family instability.

  • Build a session-rating fidelity checklist and score your own outline against it.

Your checkpoint

A 12-session treatment manual outline plus a one-page developmental adaptation matrix, self-scored against a fidelity checklist with every item rated and gaps listed.

Week 4

Developmental psychopathology and normative development & Evidence-based intervention and treatment planning

  • Contrast onset, course, and comorbidity patterns for ADHD, autism spectrum, trauma-related, and disruptive behavior presentations in a comparison table.

  • Write five original vignettes in which the correct diagnosis hinges on developmental timing or informant discrepancy, and supply answers with rationale.

  • Describe how intervention targets shift when a disruptive behavior presentation co-occurs with language delay or learning disorder.

  • Identify 10 evidence-based outcome measures and state the population and age range for each.

Your checkpoint

A set of 10 original vignettes with answer keys and rationales, plus a timed 60-item mixed practice block scored at 80% or above with every error logged by domain.

Week 5

Consultation and interprofessional collaboration (family, school, medical, and community systems) & Ethics, legal and professional issues, and cultural responsiveness

  • Script a school-based feedback conference, including an opening framing statement, three data points to convey, and a response to a disagreeing parent.

  • Map consent, assent, and confidentiality limits for minors across therapy, assessment, and school settings, citing the relevant standard for each.

  • Formulate decision rules for record release, custody disputes, and mandated reporting, including who holds privilege in each situation.

  • Plan culturally responsive adaptations to assessment, covering measure selection, norm appropriateness, language, and interpreter use.

  • Practice two consultation calls with a physician and a teacher, noting how the recommendation differs by audience.

Your checkpoint

A consultation toolkit containing one phone script, one feedback-meeting agenda, and one ethics decision flowchart applied to eight written scenarios, each with a cited standard and a stated action.

Week 6

Ethics, legal and professional issues, and cultural responsiveness & Scientific foundations, research methods, and outcome evaluation

  • Critique three published intervention studies, stating design, comparison condition, effect size, and threat to validity for each.

  • Compute and interpret number needed to treat, reliable change index, and clinically significant change from a supplied pre-post dataset.

  • Evaluate the internal and external validity of single-case designs commonly used in child treatment research.

  • Apply ethics standards to assent, incentive, and confidentiality issues in child research participation.

  • Draft an outcome-evaluation plan naming indicators, measurement schedule, and a decision rule for program continuation.

Your checkpoint

A 10-item statistics and appraisal worksheet with fully worked calculations and interpretations, plus an ethics case log of six dilemmas, each tagged to a standard and resolved in writing.

Week 7

Supervision, teaching, and professional/leadership development & Scientific foundations, research methods, and outcome evaluation

  • Construct a supervision contract that specifies goals, session structure, documentation, and evaluation criteria.

  • Build a 10-item competency rubric spanning assessment, intervention, ethics, and cultural responsiveness, with behavioral anchors at three levels.

  • Record and self-rate two feedback dialogues against the rubric, then revise the weaker one.

  • Design a program-evaluation logic model linking inputs, activities, outputs, and child outcomes for one service.

  • Write a one-hour didactic outline on developmental psychopathology with learning objectives and an assessment question set.

Your checkpoint

A supervision and teaching packet containing the signed-format contract, the anchored 10-item rubric, the revised feedback dialogue, a one-hour didactic outline, and a completed logic model.

Week 8

Assessment, diagnosis, and psychological/psychoeducational testing & Evidence-based intervention and treatment planning

  • Complete two full-length timed mock exams under exam-day conditions, scoring and logging every miss by domain and error type.

  • Re-teach your three weakest content areas by writing a one-page summary of each from memory, then verifying against sources.

  • Consolidate all prior deliverables into a single index with cross-references to each of the seven domains.

  • Rehearse a rapid-fire ethics and consultation drill of 25 items, targeting 90% accuracy.

  • Specify a maintenance plan for the two weeks before the exam, including review cadence and rest days.

Your checkpoint

A final error-analysis report with a domain-by-domain accuracy table showing every domain at 75% or above, plus a one-page exam-day checklist and the consolidated deliverable index.

Milestones

Week 2: Both case conceptualizations are complete and each diagnosis is defensible against at least two documented rule-outs.

Week 4: Mixed practice block scored at 80% or above, and the milestone timeline plus treatment outline are fully cross-referenced.

Week 6: All calculated statistics reproduce correctly, and each of the six ethics dilemmas cites a specific standard rather than a general principle.

Week 8: Both mock exams complete, domain accuracy table shows no domain below 75%, and every missed item has a written corrective note.