ABPS Ophthalmology study materials
ABPS Ophthalmology study resources

Sudden Vision Loss with a Normal-Appearing Fundus

ABPS Ophthalmology · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Sudden Vision Loss with a Normal-Appearing Fundus

A 58-year-old woman presents with painless sudden loss of vision in the right eye noted on waking 2 days ago. She describes a 'dark curtain' over the superior field. Visual acuity is counting fingers in the right eye and 20/20 in the left. Pupils: right relative afferent pupillary defect present. Anterior segment and IOP are normal. Dilated fundus examination of the right eye shows a normal-appearing macula and optic disc with no visible emboli, hemorrhage, or detachment; the left fundus is normal. She has a history of hypertension and hyperlipidemia and smokes. She asks whether this will resolve on its own and whether her other eye is at risk.

1. What is your differential diagnosis, and how do the examination findings narrow it?

Read the worked answer

Differential for sudden painless monocular vision loss with an RAPD and a normal fundus:

  • Retinal artery occlusion (central or branch) - often normal fundus early or with a pale retina; emboli may be absent.
  • Optic neuritis - usually painful with eye movement, younger patients, but can be painless; RAPD fits.
  • Ischemic optic neuropathy (arteritic or non-arteritic) - usually older, disc swelling; disc looks normal here, arguing against classic NAION.
  • Vitreous or retinal hemorrhage - excluded by clear view.
  • Retinal detachment - excluded by normal fundus.
  • Cerebral/occipital lesion - would not cause an RAPD.

Narrowing features:

  • The RAPD localizes the lesion to the optic nerve or retina (pre-chiasmal), not the media or cortex.
  • Normal fundus argues against visible detachment, large hemorrhage, or advanced disc swelling, but does not exclude retinal artery occlusion, which can appear normal early, nor retrobulbar optic neuropathy.
  • Sudden onset on waking and vascular risk factors (hypertension, hyperlipidemia, smoking) favor a vascular/embolic event, including central retinal artery occlusion or a cilioretinal/ophthalmic circulation event.
  • Age and lack of pain make demyelinating optic neuritis less likely but not impossible.

Next step is to look for subtle signs: OCT of the macula and RNFL, fluorescein angiography or OCT angiography, and a careful search for emboli.

2. What urgent systemic evaluation and management would you initiate, and why is speed important?

Read the worked answer

Treat this as a vascular emergency until proven otherwise.

Immediate ophthalmic measures:

  • OCT macula to detect subtle inner retinal thickening/edema; OCT angiography or fluorescein angiography to assess perfusion.
  • If retinal artery occlusion is confirmed or strongly suspected, ocular massage, anterior chamber paracentesis, and IOP-lowering are traditional temporizing measures of uncertain benefit; they are most useful very early and should not delay systemic workup.

Systemic evaluation (the priority):

  • Carotid imaging (duplex or CTA) for ipsilateral stenosis or plaque.
  • Cardiac evaluation: ECG, telemetry, echocardiogram to look for cardioembolic source (e.g., atrial fibrillation, valve disease).
  • Vascular risk factor assessment: blood pressure, lipids, HbA1c, and smoking cessation counseling.
  • Giant cell arteritis screen if any features suggest it (age, headache, jaw claudication, elevated ESR/CRP) - this is vision-threatening to the fellow eye and warrants urgent steroids if suspected.

Why speed matters: retinal artery occlusion is a stroke equivalent; the same embolic source threatens the brain and the fellow eye. Early systemic evaluation can prevent stroke and contralateral vision loss, even when the affected eye's vision cannot be restored.

3. How do you counsel her about prognosis and risk to the fellow eye?

Read the worked answer

Prognosis of the affected eye:

  • Visual recovery after retinal artery occlusion is generally poor; do not promise improvement. Some eyes with cilioretinal sparing or brief ischemia may recover partially.
  • Explain that the 'curtain' reflects damage to the retina and that the priority now is preventing further events.

Risk to the fellow eye and brain:

  • The fellow eye is at real risk if the underlying source (carotid disease, cardiac embolism, vasculitis) is not addressed; this is why the systemic workup is urgent.
  • Emphasize that this event may signal increased stroke risk and that she should seek emergency care for sudden neurological symptoms.

Actionable counseling:

  • Smoking cessation is one of the highest-yield interventions; offer resources.
  • Blood pressure and lipid control, and anticoagulation/antiplatelet therapy as directed by the stroke/neurology team.
  • Follow-up with ophthalmology and, importantly, primary care/neurology/stroke prevention services.
  • Set expectations that the goal is to protect the fellow eye and brain, and that she should not wait if new visual or neurological symptoms occur.