Ethical and Practical Handling of a Requested 'Cleared' Note for an Athlete Who Is Not Ready
A 17-year-old high school football player is 5 weeks post grade II hamstring strain. He still has pain with resisted knee flexion at 60 degrees and his hamstring LSI is 72%. His parents and coach pressure you to write a note clearing him for the season opener in 10 days, saying 'the other team's doctor would clear him.' The family is considering transferring to another clinic if you refuse. The athlete himself says he feels 'mostly fine' and wants to play.
1. What are the key ethical considerations, and how do you handle the request?
Read the worked answer
Ethical considerations:
- Beneficence/nonmaleficence: Clearing an athlete with objective deficits risks reinjury and prolonged absence.
- Patient welfare over external pressure: The clinician's duty is to the athlete's health, not the coach's or parents' preferences.
- Informed consent and shared decision-making: The athlete and family should understand the specific risks.
- Professional integrity: A clearance note must reflect clinical judgment; writing a false or premature clearance is a professional and legal risk.
- Conflict of interest: Pressure from third parties must not alter the recommendation.
Handling:
- Meet with the athlete and family, explain the specific deficits (pain with resisted flexion, LSI 72%) and the reinjury risk.
- Offer a written, dated progression plan so the coach sees a path forward.
- Do not write a clearance note; offer a note documenting current status and plan instead.
- If the family wishes to seek another opinion, that is their right; do not retaliate or abandon care.
- Document the discussion and the rationale thoroughly.
2. The family asks what would happen if he played anyway. How do you counsel them, and what do you document?
Read the worked answer
Counseling:
- Explain that a hamstring with residual strength deficit and pain on resisted testing is at elevated risk of reinjury, and that reinjury often results in a longer absence than the current 10 days.
- Note that the season opener is one game; a reinjury could cost the season.
- Be honest that no clinician can guarantee outcomes, but the current data indicate he is not ready.
- Offer a conditional pathway: if he meets criteria at re-test in 7-10 days, he could be cleared then.
Documentation:
- Objective findings (pain with resisted knee flexion at 60 degrees, LSI 72%).
- The request made by family/coach and the pressure applied.
- The risks explained and the family's response.
- The recommendation, the conditional plan, and the re-test date.
- That the decision was made in the athlete's best interest.
This protects the athlete and demonstrates a defensible, patient-centered process.