CEICC flashcards
CEICC · Build recall with a focused review session.
32 cards. Read the term and the definition here. The deck at the top of this page is optional.
- Binding law vs. framework
- Law and regulation are enforceable obligations; frameworks are voluntary guidance unless adopted through contract, certification scope, or regulator expectation, which converts them into requirements.
- ISO/IEC 27001
- A certifiable international standard specifying requirements for establishing, implementing, maintaining, and continually improving an information security management system, including risk assessment and a Statement of Applicability.
- SOC 2 Type II
- An independent attestation report on the operating effectiveness of controls against Trust Services Criteria over a defined period, typically three to twelve months, unlike a point-in-time Type I.
- NIST CSF functions
- The Cybersecurity Framework organizes outcomes into Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, and Recover, with Govern added in version 2.0 to address organizational context and risk strategy.
- Statement of Applicability
- An ISO 27001 document listing applicable controls, justification for inclusion or exclusion, and implementation status, demonstrating that control selection followed the risk assessment.
- GDPR lawful bases
- Processing requires one of six bases: consent, contract, legal obligation, vital interests, public task, or legitimate interests. The chosen basis must be documented and appropriate to context.
- Controller versus processor
- A controller determines the purposes and means of processing; a processor acts on documented instructions. Joint controllers share responsibility for common processing decisions and obligations.
- GDPR 72-hour notification
- Controllers must notify the supervisory authority within 72 hours of becoming aware of a personal data breach unless it is unlikely to result in a risk to individuals.
- Data minimization principle
- Personal data collected must be adequate, relevant, and limited to what is necessary for the specified purpose, reducing exposure and supporting retention limits.
- Cross-border transfer mechanisms
- Tools such as adequacy decisions, standard contractual clauses, and binding corporate rules permit international data transfers; many regimes also require a transfer impact assessment.
- Data Protection Impact Assessment
- A structured assessment required for high-risk processing, such as large-scale special-category data or systematic monitoring, identifying risks and mitigations before processing begins.
- Residual risk formula
- Residual risk equals inherent risk reduced by the effectiveness of applied controls. It is the risk remaining after treatment and must be compared against risk appetite.
- Risk treatment options
- Organizations mitigate, transfer, avoid, or accept risk. Acceptance requires documented rationale, an accountable owner, and a defined review or expiry date.
- Three lines model
- Operational management owns risk (first line), risk and compliance functions provide oversight (second line), and internal audit gives independent assurance (third line).
- NIST RMF steps
- Prepare, Categorize, Select, Implement, Assess, Authorize, and Monitor form the Risk Management Framework lifecycle for managing security and privacy risk.
- RTO and RPO
- Recovery Time Objective is the maximum acceptable downtime; Recovery Point Objective is the maximum acceptable data loss measured in time. Both guide continuity and backup design.
- Key risk indicators
- Measurable metrics with defined thresholds that signal whether risk exposure is drifting from appetite, reviewed on a set cadence and reported to governance bodies.
- Control categories
- Controls are classified as preventive, detective, corrective, deterrent, or compensating, and as administrative, technical, or physical, enabling layered and complementary safeguards.
- Least privilege
- Users and systems receive only the access necessary for their function, limiting the impact of compromise and supporting separation of duties and auditability.
- AAA model
- Authentication verifies identity, authorization grants permissions, and accounting logs activity. Together they enforce and evidence access control decisions.
- Multi-factor authentication
- Authentication combining two or more factors from different categories: something you know, something you have, or something you are. Two passwords do not satisfy MFA.
- CVSS prioritization
- The Common Vulnerability Scoring System rates severity, and remediation priority combines that score with exploitability and asset criticality rather than relying on score alone.
- Defense in depth
- Layering preventive, detective, and corrective controls so no single control failure results in full compromise, increasing attacker cost and detection likelihood.
- Incident response lifecycle
- Preparation, detection and analysis, containment, eradication and recovery, and post-incident activity structure response and ensure lessons feed back into controls.
- Breach notification triggers
- Notification duties typically arise when a breach creates a risk of harm to individuals; the risk assessment supporting notify or no-notify decisions must be documented.
- Chain of custody
- Documented control over evidence from collection through storage and analysis, establishing integrity and admissibility for investigations, regulators, and litigation.
- Incident severity tiers
- Predefined classifications based on impact, data sensitivity, and scope that determine escalation paths, notification obligations, and resource allocation during response.
- Vendor tiering
- Classifying third parties by data sensitivity and operational criticality to set proportionate due diligence depth, contract terms, and reassessment frequency.
- Fourth-party risk
- Risk arising from subprocessors and downstream providers of direct vendors, requiring visibility into the extended supply chain beyond first-tier contracts.
- Right-to-audit clause
- A contract provision granting the customer rights to assess vendor controls, specifying scope, notice, frequency, and whether independent auditors may perform the assessment.
- Audit evidence sufficiency
- Evidence must be sufficient, reliable, and relevant; system-generated logs and independent observation are stronger than self-reported attestations, and sampling introduces risk.
- Continuous control monitoring
- Automated collection and testing of control evidence that flags exceptions for human review, detecting control drift between periodic audits and reducing manual testing effort.