The Client Who Won't Talk About Food
Dana, 45, was referred by her physician after a prediabetes diagnosis. In your first three sessions she is pleasant and punctual but gives short answers. When you ask about meals she says, 'It's fine, I know what to eat.' When you ask what a typical dinner looks like, she changes the subject to her job. She has mentioned twice that her mother 'was always on a diet' and that family meals were 'a battlefield.' She has canceled one session and rescheduled another. She says she likes the accountability but 'hates talking about food.' You have 9 sessions left in the package.
1. How would you interpret and respond to Dana's avoidance?
Read the worked answer
Read the avoidance as information, not resistance to fix with pressure.
What it likely signals:
- Her comments about her mother's dieting and family 'battlefields' suggest food and eating carry a history of conflict, shame, or control. Direct food interrogation may feel like being judged or managed.
- Cancellations and rescheduling are a soft signal of ambivalence - she wants the accountability but is protecting herself from a topic that feels unsafe.
- 'I know what to eat' may be true and also a way to close the door.
How to respond:
- Name it gently and without accusation: 'I notice food questions seem to land badly. I don't want to make this another battlefield - can we talk about how you'd like to handle that?'
- Give her control over the agenda: ask what she does and doesn't want to discuss, and honor it.
- Shift the entry point away from food: focus on what she cares about - energy, her prediabetes numbers, stress, sleep, movement she enjoys, or the accountability structure she says she likes.
- Use reflective listening and open questions, tolerate silence, and avoid stacking questions.
- Explore her history at her pace, not yours.
- Revisit the coaching agreement so the plan reflects what she actually wants to work on.
2. She says, 'Can we just not talk about food at all? I'll handle that part.' How do you respond while staying useful?
Read the worked answer
Honor the request as far as you responsibly can, and be transparent about the limits.
Reasoning:
- Autonomy is central: a client can decline to discuss a topic. Pushing anyway damages trust and the working alliance.
- But her referral goal is prediabetes management, where eating patterns matter. Pretending food is irrelevant would be dishonest and unhelpful.
What to say:
- 'Yes - I won't make food the center of our sessions. I also want to be honest: your doctor referred you for prediabetes, and food is one lever. I can do a lot of good work with you on sleep, stress, movement, and consistency without turning this into a food interrogation. If you ever want to bring food in, the door's open.'
- Offer a low-threat structure: she chooses whether to share anything about eating, and you'll focus on behaviors she names.
- Suggest that a registered dietitian could handle the nutrition specifics if and when she wants that, and offer to coordinate.
- Document her preference and your response.
This keeps the relationship and the referral goal alive without coercion.
3. How do you use the remaining 9 sessions and measure progress given this constraint?
Read the worked answer
Recontract around her goals and use measures that don't require food disclosure.
Plan:
- Recontract: In the next session, revisit goals explicitly. Ask what success would look like to her in 9 sessions, and write the plan together.
- Choose in-scope levers she'll engage with: sleep regularity, stress management, a walking or strength routine she enjoys, planning for high-risk times (late work, travel), and the accountability check-ins she says she values.
- Measure what she'll share: session attendance and engagement, self-reported energy and mood, steps or activity minutes, sleep, and any labs her physician shares. Weight and food logs only if she offers them.
- Check the referral goal: ask whether she is following up with her physician on prediabetes monitoring, and encourage that.
- Watch the alliance: track cancellations and short answers as data. If avoidance deepens, raise it directly rather than letting sessions drift.
- Know the limit: if her needs clearly require nutrition therapy she won't address with you, name that and refer, rather than coasting for 9 sessions.