Dismissal After a Workplace Injury
Yusuf has worked for Al Manara Logistics for six years under an unlimited-term contract. In August 2024 he suffered a back injury lifting cargo and filed a workers' compensation claim. While on approved sick leave, the HR manager sent him a WhatsApp message: 'Your position is no longer needed; effective next week you are terminated.' No written notice, no end-of-service calculation, and no mention of the injury. Yusuf's sick leave had 20 days remaining. He has not been paid his final settlement. He wants to challenge the dismissal and recover his entitlements. The employer claims the termination was a lawful redundancy and that the WhatsApp message was informal.
1. Advise Yusuf on the validity of the dismissal and the most favourable route to challenge it.
Read the worked answer
Several defects stack up against the employer:
Form. Termination must be in writing and properly notified. A WhatsApp message from HR is at best evidence of intent, not a compliant written notice - especially where the employer itself calls it 'informal'.
Timing. Yusuf was on approved sick leave. Dismissal during protected sick leave, particularly where it follows a filed compensation claim, invites an abuse-of-right and retaliation challenge.
Redundancy. A genuine redundancy requires an objective business justification and proper process. 'Your position is no longer needed' with no evidence of restructuring is thin.
Unpaid settlement. End-of-service gratuity, accrued leave, and notice pay are due on any lawful termination; withholding them compounds the employer's exposure.
Route: Yusuf should file before the labour dispute committee (MOHRE) first - mandatory pre-litigation step - then proceed to the Labour Court if unresolved. He should plead arbitrary dismissal (compensation up to three months' wage in addition to statutory entitlements), unpaid gratuity, and accrued leave. He should preserve the WhatsApp message, medical reports, and the compensation file.
2. How should the employer's 'informal message' argument be answered, and what does Yusuf need to prove?
Read the worked answer
The employer cannot have it both ways. If the message was informal, then no valid termination occurred and Yusuf remains employed (entitled to wages for the period). If it was a termination, then it must meet the statutory form and grounds. Either way the employer loses on this point.
Yusuf must prove:
- the employment relationship and its duration (contract, wage records, residency);
- the fact and date of termination (the WhatsApp message, with metadata);
- the injury and the compensation claim (to establish the retaliation link);
- the amounts owed (payslips, leave balance).
Burden note: once Yusuf shows dismissal during protected leave following a claim, the evidential burden shifts to the employer to show a genuine, independent reason. A bare assertion of redundancy will not discharge it.