AEPA Physical Education (NT506) study materials
AEPA Physical Education (NT506) study resources

Hopping, Skipping, and a Wide Range of Second-Grade Movers

AEPA Physical Education (NT506) · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Hopping, Skipping, and a Wide Range of Second-Grade Movers

At a K–2 elementary school, you teach a 45-minute PE class to 24 second graders. The gym has six poly spots, four jump ropes, and a painted midline. During a locomotor warm-up, you observe: 15 students skip smoothly with alternating steps; 6 hop on one foot but cannot skip; 2 skip with a gallop pattern (same-foot lead); and 1 student, Mia, has low muscle tone and avoids all one-foot hopping, preferring to slide. The classroom teacher mentions that several of these students also struggle with rhythm activities in music. Your principal asks you to show measurable progress on the state standard for locomotor combinations by the end of the nine-week quarter.

1. Analyze the observed movement patterns and propose a whole-class instructional sequence that also addresses the 2 gallopers and the 6 non-skippers.

Read the worked answer

The pattern suggests a developmental sequence: galloping and hopping are prerequisites; skipping is a composite step-hop with alternating lead. The 15 smooth skippers are at a mature pattern; the 6 hoppers can hop but have not integrated the step-hop rhythm; the 2 gallopers have a same-foot lead and need to feel the step-hop alternation; Mia avoids one-foot support, so her entry point is two-foot rhythm and supported toe taps. Whole-class sequence: (a) rhythmic marching to a drumbeat with opposite arm swing; (b) stationary step-hop, holding a rope if needed; (c) traveling step-hop over poly spots; (d) skip in 8-count phrases. For the gallopers, cue 'step-hop, switch' and have them gallop to a beat before adding the hop. For the non-skippers, break the skip into step-hop on alternating feet, then chain two cycles. Success criterion: 8 consecutive skips with alternating feet and rhythmic arm swing.

2. How would you modify instruction for Mia while keeping her in the general program and still addressing the same standard?

Read the worked answer

Keep Mia in the general program but change the support demand and equipment. Substitute two-foot jumps and alternating toe taps on a low step for one-foot hopping; allow a slide or gallop as a rhythm entry; use a poly spot and a rope for proprioceptive feedback; pair her with a steady partner. Do not force one-foot hopping to fatigue; low tone affects postural stability, so short bouts with rest are better. Set an individualized goal on the same standard: perform a rhythmic step-hop combination with two-foot support and one supported one-foot tap, then progress to an unsupported hop when she is ready. Collaborate with the OT/PT and family, and document the modification. Keep the affective climate positive so she is not singled out.

3. What assessment evidence would you collect over the nine weeks, and how would you make the scoring reliable?

Read the worked answer

Collect three sources: (1) video of a 10-second locomotor sequence at weeks 1, 5, and 9; (2) a rubric with four observable criteria-alternating feet, rhythm or beat, arm-leg opposition, and travel-scored 0–2; and (3) a student self-check with a picture cue. To improve reliability, use the same task and cues each time, score the median of three trials, and have a colleague double-score a random 20% sample. Do not score only the final product; report change from baseline. For Mia, use the individualized rubric but keep the same criteria. Report class-level progress to the principal as the percentage of students meeting the criterion for 8 consecutive skips, and use the data to reteach the two gallopers and the six non-skippers in small groups.