AHIP PHIAS study materials
AHIP PHIAS study resources

The Small-Group Owner and the Consumer-Directed Trio

AHIP PHIAS · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

The Small-Group Owner and the Consumer-Directed Trio

Priya owns a 14-employee landscaping company. She wants to offer benefits but has a tight budget. She is considering: (1) an HSA-qualified high-deductible health plan paired with an HSA, (2) an HRA, and (3) a health care flexible spending account. Her broker proposes a plan with a $3,200 self-only deductible and a $6,400 family deductible, with employer HSA contributions of $1,000 for self-only and $2,000 for family. Two employees have significant chronic conditions and predictable costs; one employee is 63 and on a fixed income; several are hourly workers with low cash flow. Priya asks whether she can offer an HRA alongside the HSA and whether the FSA is compatible.

1. Can Priya pair a general-purpose HRA with the HSA-qualified HDHP? What about the FSA?

Read the worked answer

A general-purpose HRA is disqualifying - HSA contributions require that the individual have no other health coverage other than the HDHP, and a general-purpose HRA counts as disqualifying coverage. The same is true for a general-purpose health care FSA: it is disqualifying coverage for HSA eligibility.

Exceptions: a limited-purpose HRA or limited-purpose FSA that reimburses only dental, vision, and preventive care is compatible with an HSA. A post-deductible HRA (pays only after the minimum deductible is met) is also compatible.

So Priya can offer an HSA-qualified HDHP with an HSA, plus a limited-purpose FSA or limited-purpose/post-deductible HRA, but not a general-purpose HRA or general-purpose FSA for HSA-eligible employees. She must choose the architecture deliberately.

2. How should she think about employer HSA contributions and the employees with chronic conditions and low cash flow?

Read the worked answer

Employer HSA contributions are a powerful lever: they are tax-deductible to the employer, tax-free to the employee, and can offset the high deductible. But the contribution counts toward the employee's annual HSA limit, so the employer must track combined contributions.

For the two employees with chronic conditions, a $3,200 deductible means substantial out-of-pocket before coverage kicks in, even with the $1,000 employer seed. Priya should model total annual cost (premium + deductible + coinsurance) versus a lower-deductible plan. A limited-purpose FSA can help with dental/vision, but not medical.

For the low-cash-flow hourly workers, the employer seed plus payroll deduction is key. Consider allowing pre-tax payroll HSA contributions and timing the employer contribution early in the year to cover early claims. For the 63-year-old, note that HSA eligibility ends at Medicare entitlement, and catch-up contributions are available at 55+.

3. What compliance and design traps should Priya avoid?

Read the worked answer

Several: (1) The HDHP must meet the minimum deductible and maximum out-of-pocket limits for the year; the proposed $3,200 self-only deductible must satisfy the minimum. (2) Employer HSA contributions must be comparable for similarly situated employees or made through a cafeteria plan to avoid discrimination issues. (3) The FSA must be a cafeteria plan with a written plan document, nondiscrimination testing, and a use-it-or-lose-it or carryover rule. (4) If she offers an HRA, it must be integrated with group health coverage and satisfy nondiscrimination rules. (5) State mandates may require certain benefits.

She should also confirm the plan is ACA-compliant for a small group (14 employees) - community rating, essential health benefits, and the small-group market rules apply.