The Groupon Adjustment: Advertising, Inducements, and Informed Consent
Dr. Priya Nair opens a new clinic in Fairbanks and launches a marketing campaign: a $29 'new patient special' that includes an exam, X-rays, and an adjustment; a social-media post claiming her technique 'corrects the root cause of disease and lets your body heal itself, including asthma and diabetes'; a Yelp offer of a free massage for any patient who leaves a 5-star review; and a Groupon for a 'lifetime wellness package' priced at $1,200. A new patient, Mr. Okafor, comes in for the $29 special, is adjusted the same visit after a brief exam, and is told he needs 36 visits over 12 weeks. He later complains he was never told about alternatives or risks.
1. Evaluate each marketing element against Alaska advertising and professional-conduct standards.
Read the worked answer
Go element by element:
- $29 exam/X-ray/adjustment special: Discounted introductory offers are generally permissible if truthful and not a bait-and-switch. The risk is if the advertised price is not actually available or hidden fees appear at checkout; then it becomes deceptive.
- 'Corrects root cause of disease... asthma and diabetes': This is the most serious problem. Claiming a chiropractic adjustment treats or cures asthma and diabetes is unsupported and misleading, and it invites discipline for false or deceptive advertising. It also creates informed-consent problems because it overstates benefit.
- Free massage for a 5-star review: This is a paid inducement for positive reviews and is deceptive to consumers who rely on reviews. It should be discontinued; reviews must be genuine.
- 'Lifetime wellness package' at $1,200: The term 'lifetime' is vague and potentially misleading; a prepaid multi-year package also raises questions about refunds if the practice closes or the patient moves. It should be reworded with clear terms, duration, and refund policy.
General rule: advertising must be truthful, not deceptive, and must not create unjustified expectations of cure.
2. Was Mr. Okafor's same-day adjustment and 36-visit plan defensible on informed consent? What should have happened?
Read the worked answer
Likely not defensible as presented. Informed consent requires that the patient understand the proposed treatment, its reasonably foreseeable risks and benefits, and reasonable alternatives (including no treatment), and that he agrees. A brief exam followed by an immediate adjustment and a scripted 36-visit plan does not demonstrate that conversation occurred.
What should have happened:
- A documented examination sufficient to justify the adjustment.
- A documented consent discussion covering risks, benefits, alternatives, and the right to decline.
- A treatment plan presented as a recommendation with rationale, not a predetermined package, and an explanation of how progress would be reassessed.
- A signed consent form plus a note reflecting the conversation.
The 36-visit recommendation is not per se improper, but it must be individualized, supported by findings, and subject to review. Presenting it as a fixed package on day one, tied to a discount offer, looks like a sales model rather than clinical judgment.
3. Mr. Okafor files a complaint. What should Dr. Nair do, and what are the likely issues the Board will examine?
Read the worked answer
Dr. Nair should:
- Preserve the complete record, including the marketing materials, the intake and consent forms, and the treatment notes. Do not alter them.
- Respond to the Board truthfully and on time; retain counsel if the matter proceeds.
- Immediately correct or pull the misleading claims and the review inducement.
- Not contact the complainant in a coercive way or offer anything in exchange for withdrawing the complaint.
Likely Board issues:
- False/deceptive advertising - the disease-cure claims and the review inducement.
- Informed consent - whether a real consent discussion occurred and was documented.
- Standard of care / recordkeeping - whether the exam supported the adjustment and the 36-visit plan, and whether the chart reflects it.
- Overutilization / financial exploitation - whether the prepaid package and visit plan were driven by revenue rather than need.
Remediation matters: documented corrective action, revised advertising, and improved consent and treatment-planning procedures will be relevant to outcome.