Pharmacy Technician Ratio and Supervision in a Retail Setting
A community pharmacy in Fairbanks employs one pharmacist and three pharmacy technicians. The pharmacist is on duty alone for the entire 10-hour shift. The pharmacy is busy, and the pharmacist is also responsible for immunizations and counseling. Alaska law (12 AAC 52.220) sets the ratio of pharmacy technicians to pharmacists. The pharmacist asks a technician to perform final verification of a prescription by comparing the label to the stock bottle, a task typically performed by the pharmacist. The technician has been certified for 2 years and has completed a board-approved training program. A customer observes this and complains to the board. The board investigates and finds that the pharmacist allowed the technician to perform final verification on 15 prescriptions that day.
1. What is the maximum technician-to-pharmacist ratio in Alaska for a community pharmacy, and did the pharmacist violate it? Explain.
Read the worked answer
Alaska law (12 AAC 52.220) sets the ratio of pharmacy technicians to pharmacists at 3:1 for a community pharmacy, unless the pharmacy has a higher ratio approved by the board. The pharmacy has one pharmacist and three technicians, so the ratio is at the maximum allowed. However, the ratio is not the only issue. The pharmacist must provide adequate supervision. The board may consider whether the pharmacist can effectively supervise three technicians while also performing immunizations and counseling. The ratio is met, but the pharmacist's delegation of final verification is a separate violation. The ratio itself is not violated, but the supervision may be inadequate if the pharmacist cannot oversee all tasks. The board would evaluate the specific circumstances.
2. Was it permissible for the pharmacy technician to perform final verification of prescriptions? Discuss the pharmacist's responsibilities and potential disciplinary actions.
Read the worked answer
No. Under Alaska law (12 AAC 52.240), the pharmacist is responsible for the final verification of a prescription before dispensing. A pharmacy technician may assist in filling, but the pharmacist must verify the final product. The technician's certification and training do not authorize final verification. The pharmacist's delegation of this task violates the pharmacist's duty and constitutes unprofessional conduct. The board may take disciplinary action against the pharmacist for failing to provide adequate supervision and for allowing a technician to perform a task reserved for pharmacists. Potential actions include a reprimand, fine, probation, suspension, or revocation, depending on the severity and history. The technician may also face action for performing a task beyond their scope. The pharmacist should have personally verified each prescription.