ALTA NTP (Legal Specialty Certifications) study plan
ALTA NTP · Give each week a clear focus.
8 weeks · About 6 hours per week
Source-language comprehension and fidelity
Diagram clause structure and pronoun reference for three source passages of 250-300 words each, marking every embedded clause and every instance where the antecedent is implicit rather than stated.
Flag and label at least ten spots where the source is genuinely ambiguous (scope of a modifier, unmarked number, vague agent) and write the two competing readings for each before choosing one.
Inventory the register signals in each passage-honorifics, hedges, passive density, nominalization-and note which ones carry meaning that must survive translation.
Build a personal checklist of the five comprehension failures you are most prone to (false cognates, missed negation scope, misread connectors) and test it against a fourth unseen passage.
Your checkpoint
A four-passage comprehension dossier: annotated source text, ambiguity log with dual readings, register inventory, and a self-scored checklist with a written verdict on whether each passage is now fully understood.
Source-language comprehension and fidelity & Target-language accuracy and naturalness
Translate the four passages from week 1 at sentence level, then compare each target sentence against the source to isolate every place where meaning shifted, dropped, or was added.
Split at least fifteen long source sentences into target sentences that follow target-language information order rather than source word order, recording the reason for each split.
Identify and eliminate calques by listing ten source-language collocations and writing the idiomatic target equivalent or confirming that a literal rendering is genuinely acceptable.
Distinguish fidelity errors (meaning lost) from naturalness errors (meaning intact, phrasing awkward) by tagging every self-caught issue in one category or the other.
Your checkpoint
A side-by-side translation of all four passages with a tagged error log showing at least 30 self-identified issues sorted into fidelity, naturalness, and stylistic categories.
Target-language accuracy and naturalness
Rewrite ten of your own awkward target sentences into two alternative versions each, then select the better one and justify the choice in one written line.
Test target-language collocation by checking twenty verb-noun and adjective-noun pairings against corpus intuition, native-style reference works, or parallel texts, and replace any that fail.
Match the source register deliberately: produce one deliberately formal and one deliberately plain rendering of the same paragraph and articulate what lexical and syntactic levers produced the shift.
Reduce sentence length variance problems by revising a paragraph so that no more than two consecutive sentences share the same opening structure.
Your checkpoint
A revision portfolio of 20 before-and-after sentence pairs with one-line justifications, plus a 300-word reflection naming the three naturalness habits you still need to break.
Target-language accuracy and naturalness & Terminology, register, and domain-specific conventions
Extract 40 domain-specific terms from your practice passages and record source term, target term, part of speech, definition, and one attested usage for each.
Rank each term by confidence and mark the ten least certain ones for verification against authoritative glossaries, standards documents, or subject-matter literature.
Detect and correct register mismatches where a technically correct term belongs to the wrong formality level or the wrong sub-specialty.
Apply a consistent policy for acronyms, abbreviations, and proper names across all practice texts rather than deciding case by case.
Your checkpoint
A 40-entry bilingual termbase with confidence ratings and a written terminology policy covering acronyms, proper names, and preferred variants.
Terminology, register, and domain-specific conventions
Compare the house conventions of three distinct text types (a contract clause, a technical procedure, a public-facing notice) and list what each genre demands in the target language.
Rewrite one passage three times to conform to the three genre conventions identified, keeping meaning constant while changing syntactic packaging.
Resolve five terminology conflicts where two sources disagree by weighing authority, recency, and frequency, and document the decision rule you applied.
Audit your termbase for consistency by running one full pass in which every repeated term is checked against the recorded entry.
Your checkpoint
A genre conventions sheet for three text types plus three renderings of the same passage that visibly conform to each, with a consistency audit report.
Terminology, register, and domain-specific conventions & Mechanics, formatting, and cultural adaptation
Standardize number, date, currency, and unit formatting across a practice text according to target-locale conventions, and list every conversion you performed.
Reproduce source formatting elements-headings, lists, tables rendered in prose, emphasis, parentheticals-faithfully in a target document with a clean layout.
Verify every cross-reference, citation, and internal pointer in a practice text so that the reference resolves correctly in the target version.
Proofread for mechanical errors (punctuation spacing, capitalization, quotation mark style, hyphenation) and log each correction by type.
Your checkpoint
A fully formatted target document of at least 700 words with a formatting decision log and a zero-remaining-error proofreading pass.
Mechanics, formatting, and cultural adaptation
Locate and adapt at least ten culture-specific items (institutions, holidays, measures, idioms, forms of address) and justify each choice as retain, adapt, or gloss.
Identify passages where a literal transfer would confuse or mislead the target reader and rewrite them to preserve function rather than form.
Apply a documented style guide of your own making to a full text, covering capitalization, italics for foreign terms, and treatment of untranslatable items.
Review a previously completed translation cold, one week later, and record which errors were invisible during drafting.
Your checkpoint
A cultural adaptation report covering ten items with rationale, plus a one-page personal style guide applied without exception to a finished text.
Source-language comprehension and fidelity & Target-language accuracy and naturalness & Terminology, register, and domain-specific conventions & Mechanics, formatting, and cultural adaptation
Complete two timed translations of 400 words each under 90-minute limits, then score them against a four-domain rubric built from your earlier checklists.
Diagnose every remaining error by root cause (comprehension, transfer, terminology, mechanics) and rank the causes by frequency rather than by severity alone.
Rehearse the pre-delivery QA sequence end to end: compare against source, read target alone for naturalness, check terminology consistency, then check mechanics.
Write a personal pre-exam protocol listing the checks you will run and in what order, sized to fit the time actually available during the exam.
Your checkpoint
Two timed translations with rubric scores, a root-cause error Pareto chart in text form, and a final one-page exam-day protocol.
Milestones
Week 2: Complete one unseen 300-word passage under light time pressure and score at least 85% of source meaning units correctly transferred, with no unflagged comprehension errors.
Week 4: Termbase reaches 40 verified entries with at least 90% subsequently judged correct, and a blind re-read of week-3 output produces no fidelity errors.
Week 6: A 700-word formatted target document passes a self-administered mechanical checklist with zero remaining formatting or punctuation defects.
Week 8: Both timed translations finish within limit and score at least 80% on each of the four domain rubrics, with no single domain below 70%.